About me
Archive
About me

36 Grays Lane

close

Warning: This post was published more than 10 years ago.

I keep old posts on the site because sometimes it's interesting to read old content. Not everything that is old is bad. Also, I think people might be interested to track how my views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured!

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might have changed in the 10 years since I wrote this post.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Many thanks for your understanding.

I know I claim not to do this sort of thing, but just wanted to point you in the direction of this website, which is essentially campaigning for the creation of accommodation for families of those receiving long-term treatment in military hospitals.

It seems a worthy cause – I have slight misgivings about supporting the specifics of a planning application in an area I’ve never so much as visited, and was mildly insulted at the insistence that prefab housing equals “builder’s huts” which could not provide a “supportive environment” – I’m sure the hundreds of thousands (millions?) of British kids who grew up in such accommodation for a good four or five decades post-war (and those who still do) would disagree.

But while I might quibble about their tone, I do see their point, and their aim seems pretty worthwhile and unobjectionable.

It seems worth your time and energy to support – as of course are similar civilian schemes like this.

This 1,193rd post was filed under: Headliner.






More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 5th October 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd September 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 5th August 2017)

Writing speeches for Andrew Lansley (published 11th February 2012)

Debunking the D-Notice meme (published 19th March 2012)

Site restructuring (published 6th May 2008)

Elias Fotinis DeskPins (published 27th December 2004)


Comments and responses

Comment from Joe Horner


by Joe Horner

Comment posted at 10:39 on 30th July 2007.

Thanks for helping us highlight this! Real apology for how the “builders hut” comment about prefabs appeared to you, honestly no offence was meant. In fact, I grew up in one (pre-fab, not a builders’ hut)! That said, as I wrote the text, I have to take the blame if it upset anyone.

What I was trying to get across with that was the apparent attitude of the objectors that these families should be stuck anywhere as long as it wasn’t in their street. The “remarkably high standard” portable buildings some of them referred to are hardly immediately welcoming and homely.

The people you talk of made real homes, over time, in prefabs. Their families, and their family spirit, were at the heart of that, not the building. Exactly the families and spirit that SSAFA hope to support. But, to make a “homely” feel for people like these visiting relatives, in the short stays they have with their loved ones, surely something more “concrete” is needed?

So, for any ex-prefab dwellers (like myself) who remember their childhood homes with fondness, I really didn’t mean it “like that”. And thanks again for helping spread the campaign.

J


Comment from Biped


by Biped

Comment posted at 16:16 on 30th July 2007.

Thanks very much for highlighting this important issue. The forces personnel getting treatment in Headley Court need to have their families around them as much as possible, if only to speed up their recovery and help each other deal with the emotional aspects of their injuries.

The support this issue is getting from around the world is most humbling, but very much needed as the Mole Valley Planning Department is deciding on this issue on Wed 1st August.

If anyone wishes to assist, please do what you can, but here are some suggestions:

Tell all your friends and family; visit http://www.36grayslane.co.uk/ to get some information on the debate; visit the government petition website and add your name to the petition that supports SSAFA (the charity applying to have the property turned into a residence for the families of those recovering); write to the Mole Valley Planning Department lending your support to the SSAFA application.


Comment from Mort Karman


by Mort Karman

Comment posted at 15:48 on 5th August 2007.

Here on the other side of the big pond we have Ronald McDonald House, a chain of homes set up for families of children who are spending lengths of time in hospitals around the country. It is a private funded operation of McDonald’s Restaurant chain and does a fantastic service by providing a place for relatives to stay while the youngsters are getting treatment.
Perhaps such a system could be set up for the families of military people being treated in hospital. I agree the government should be responsible for the care of those in service of their country and I also agree families of service people are also government responsibility.
But these days, in your country, as well as mine “government responsibility” is an oxymoron.
So perhaps some private company or group can do the right thing that governments should have done in the first place.
At least the UK is not as bad as some third world countries where the legislators get saleries many mes higher then your Prime Minister or our President and most of the people live on international food aid.


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.