About me
Archive
About me

A busy week to come

close

Warning: This post was published more than 11 years ago.

I keep old posts on the site because sometimes it's interesting to read old content. Not everything that is old is bad. Also, I think people might be interested to track how my views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured!

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might have changed in the 11 years since I wrote this post.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Many thanks for your understanding.

The latest on Charles’s wedding problems:

Prince Charles’ wedding to Camilla Parker Bowles will go ahead Friday as planned, even if it clashes with the funeral of Pope John Paul II, the prince’s office said Sunday.

This just seems a foolish position to take, because most of the people invited to the wedding (or at least the civil ceremony) will be expected (and no doubt will attend) the funeral in Rome. Last time I checked, people can’t be in two places at once, so Charles will end up with no wedding guests, making the whole event look even more of a farce than before.

It’ll also present a bit of a dilemma to the journalists – which is more important, the unpopular wedding of the future king of our country, or the funeral of the greatly respected leader of over one billion worldwide? It’s certainly not clear-cut, because they’re both about as high as high can be on their relative importance scales.

As it happens, I shouldn’t think it would matter anyway, since I think the Pope’s funeral will be on Thursday, not that I have any particular basis for that feeling. If I’m right, though, it will be a mighty busy news week, with the election called on Tuesday (thanks to the sensible and respectful delay in the election announcement), and the wedding on Friday. Monday will probably have lots of coverage of Mr Blair’s visits to Westminster Cathedral, and Wednesday will be busy with the last PMQs before the dissolution of Parliament.

The worst possible problem for Mr Blair now would be the unlikely calling of the funeral for Wednesday, which would see him miss the last PMQs, and struggle to get an announcement out on Tuesday. Of course, he could surprise us all and announce next week, or even dumbfound us all and wait until June, Maggie Thatcher style – though that would be a bad move, considering the battering Labour are likely to receive in the local elections – unless Milburn et al can work that into the masochism strategy somehow.

Whichever way you look at it, though, this week is going to be a biggun’ in almost every news sphere, and with an intense election campaign and conclave looking like they’re going to coincide, it won’t be letting up any time soon.

This 472nd post was filed under: News and Comment.






More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 6th February 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 31st December 2016)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 30th November 2016)

Vatican appoints official Da Vinci Code debunker (published 16th March 2005)

We’re not sorry. We’re Labour. (published 29th January 2005)

Feelin’ Hot Hot Hot (published 16th July 2003)

Photo-a-day 324: An unusual supermarket concession (published 19th November 2012)


Comments and responses

No comments or responses to this article have been published yet.

Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.