» sjhoward.co.uk

"The 29th best non-aligned political blog in the UK" - Iain Dale, 2006
  • Archive
  • Videos
  • Work
  • Tools
  • Freebies
  • Subscibe
  • Shop
  • Book
  • About
  • To Lie and Lie Again

    Filed at 18:10 on 31st March 2005.
    Filed by sjhoward at 18:10 on Thursday, 31st March 2005 under Election 2005.

    I said I’d love FactCheck. Talk about multiple lies from the Labour party:

    I notice that the Conservatives are offering £50 a week to help with childcare. A couple of months ago they were getting headlines for offering £150 a week, so there has already been a huge cut in the help they are offering families for childcare

    So said Patricia Hewitt on Breakfast. The only problem being that the Conservatives never promised £150 in the first place. So does our Trade and Industry Secretary walk off with her tail between her legs. Erm, not exactly…

    In November, the Tory offer was £150 a week to mothers to stay at home. Today we learn that the Tories have backtracked on this and will only offer £50 a week. It is clear the Tories cannot afford the £150 a week because of their commitment to cut £35bn from public spending

    That was Alan “I’ll do anything to win” Milburn, writing in The Grauniad. As much as Labour would like it otherwise, repeating a lie does not suddenly make it true. But you’ve got to give them credit for perseverence:

    At a press conference after her BBC appearance on Easter Monday, Ms Hewitt was challenged about the claim by a journalist who accused her of mixing up maternity pay and childcare allowances. The female reporter said: “You have said the Tories have obviously cut their pledge on childcare. They have not. That is a cheap shot as far as I can see.”

    But Ms Hewitt refused to admit she was wrong.

    She said: “If you go back to the headlines at the time of the Conservative briefing a couple of months ago, what you will see is very clear headlines, that they persuaded people to write, saying £150 a week for childcare - that has now come down to £50 a week for childcare.”

    But, you see, FactCheck did go back to the headlines at the time of the Conservative briefing:

    FactCheck went back to the press cuttings relating to the Tory proposals in November and the coverage made it very clear the £150 payment related to maternity pay and not help with childcare costs.

    So she’s trying to weasel her way out of blatant lying by - erm - lying some more. Go Pat!

    The official party response to this much-repeated lie?

    We would accept that after they [the Conservatives] had done their press conference that particular claim is not something that we are going to continue to make. We will not continue to make that claim

    So they’re not going to admit they were wrong, nor apologise for lying. But then, what more could we expect from Labour?



    Interact with this post

    » Leave a comment or trackback about this post

    » Read others' comments, or subscribe to this post's RSS comments feed


    Your Comments and Responses

    Your comments and responses

    No comments have been left about this post... Why not leave one?


    Write a new comment or response

    Commenting allows you to respond to what the author and other commenters have been said. Comments often appear on this page instantly, though sometimes take a little longer - especially if you are new to the site.

    Enter your comment in the text area below. You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Note: By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's Comment Policy.
    Gravatar: To show your face, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.






    Printed from http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2005/03/31/to-lie-and-lie-again
    (c) sjhoward.co.uk - full conditions can be viewed at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/
    The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site.