» sjhoward.co.uk

  • « Archive »
  • « Book »
  • « Twitter »
    •  WAFFLING ON SINCE 2003
  • « About Me »
  • « Academia »
  • « RSS »
    •

    France and Belgium’s banned airlines

    It strikes me as odd that the lists published by France and Belgium should be mutually exclusive. One would think that they would use similar criteria to decide whether or not an airline was safe, and thus if it’s safe enough to fly over Belgium, then why not over France? And vice-versa? Surely one would expect at least some overlap?





    Comment

    Share

    Your Comments and Responses

    Comment from Carolus Magnus

    But really should there not have been different lists for Vlaanderen and Wallonie?

    2nd September 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 23:51 on 02 September 05


    Write a new comment or response

    Commenting allows you to respond to what the author and other commenters have been said. Comments often appear on this page instantly, though sometimes take a little longer - especially if you are new to the site.

    Enter your comment in the text area below. You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Note: By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's Comment Policy.
    Gravatar: To show your face, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.





    Welcome to my blog!
    I've been writing here since May 2003, and waffle on about all sorts of stuff.
    See this page for more about me, or follow me on twitter. Enjoy browsing, commenting, and getting involved!

    Printed from http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/03/07/true-bicameralism-landmarks-and-speed-cameras
    (c) sjhoward.co.uk - full conditions can be viewed at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/
    The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site.