<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Correction: Miliblog did not cost £6,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2006/06/24/correction-miliblog-did-not-cost-36000/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2006/06/24/correction-miliblog-did-not-cost-36000</link>
	<description>Reactionary, ill-informed, fabulous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Use WordPress Like Everyone Else at Cllr Iain Lindley&#8217;s Diary</title>
		<link>http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2006/06/24/correction-miliblog-did-not-cost-36000/comment-page-1#comment-83464</link>
		<dc:creator>Use WordPress Like Everyone Else at Cllr Iain Lindley&#8217;s Diary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2006/06/24/correction-miliblog-did-not-cost-%c2%a36000#comment-83464</guid>
		<description>[...] know that taxpayer-funded blogs are ludicrously poor value for money. David Miliband&#8217;s blog cost over £8000 of taxpayers&#8217; money. Salford City Council blew over £30000 on Councillor.Info. One would hope that Sir Richard&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know that taxpayer-funded blogs are ludicrously poor value for money. David Miliband&#8217;s blog cost over £8000 of taxpayers&#8217; money. Salford City Council blew over £30000 on Councillor.Info. One would hope that Sir Richard&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjhoward</title>
		<link>http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2006/06/24/correction-miliblog-did-not-cost-36000/comment-page-1#comment-22176</link>
		<dc:creator>sjhoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 06:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2006/06/24/correction-miliblog-did-not-cost-%c2%a36000#comment-22176</guid>
		<description>Just as soon as I&#039;m getting £8,150 from the taxpayer to fund this place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as soon as I&#8217;m getting £8,150 from the taxpayer to fund this place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fern</title>
		<link>http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2006/06/24/correction-miliblog-did-not-cost-36000/comment-page-1#comment-22088</link>
		<dc:creator>Fern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2006/06/24/correction-miliblog-did-not-cost-%c2%a36000#comment-22088</guid>
		<description>So when can I expect my cheque?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when can I expect my cheque?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
