<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My first thoughts on Brown&#8217;s cabinet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/06/28/my-first-thoughts-on-browns-cabinet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/06/28/my-first-thoughts-on-browns-cabinet</link>
	<description>Reactionary, ill-informed, fabulous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brown&#8217;s Problem: Entrenched Blairism &#171; Tony Blair</title>
		<link>http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/06/28/my-first-thoughts-on-browns-cabinet/comment-page-1#comment-73468</link>
		<dc:creator>Brown&#8217;s Problem: Entrenched Blairism &#171; Tony Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/06/28/my-first-thoughts-on-browns-cabinet#comment-73468</guid>
		<description>[...] is not that Brown&#8217;s Cabinet and Ministers are just not too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is not that Brown&#8217;s Cabinet and Ministers are just not too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjhoward</title>
		<link>http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/06/28/my-first-thoughts-on-browns-cabinet/comment-page-1#comment-70945</link>
		<dc:creator>sjhoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/06/28/my-first-thoughts-on-browns-cabinet#comment-70945</guid>
		<description>Hey Gary, 

I have to admit that I haven&#039;t seen Alan Johnson being questioned, but I&#039;ve read about his plans, and I agree that a year-long consultation is... unhelpful.  If he reviews services without changing anything, surely morale will stay low for another twelve months, the problems with ST applications for junior doctors will be repeated next year, and - essentially - nothing will get done. 

On the other hand, I guess it&#039;s hard to truly tackle a problem without getting your head round the problem as a whole - chipping round the edges at whatever the &lt;i&gt;Daily Mail&lt;/i&gt; has as it&#039;s latest moan seems to have caused much of the current damage - but I don&#039;t understand why a full year of consultation is necessary.  As you rightly say, people know what the problems are already, they just need sorting into a logical form, and sorting ASAP. 

You&#039;re way ahead of me on Norman Lamb... I have to say I have no idea what the Lib Dem policy is on hospital cleaning, though I probably should!  Having said that, I don&#039;t know much about any Lib Dem policies at the moment - I know I thought Sir Menzies would be a good leader, but I&#039;m starting to agree with his dissenters... The obvious problem being that there&#039;s no-one who seems particularly well placed to replace him.  But to the point... 

Wards are currently cleaned by private companies, and it&#039;s clear that they have more interest in profit than cleanliness, so I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s the right way to go - unless, of course, you do some kind of privatisation on a national scale, where one company is responsible for cleaning all hospitals.  That would be quite an interesting idea, and could help to relieve some of the strain on the NHS, and some of the difficulties of individual hospitals having to negotiate comparatively tiny contracts.  It would presumably give someone real ownership of the cleanliness problem, which is (I think) the way to get it tackled.

As for &#039;diverging the health of the nation from politics&#039; - that&#039;s a fab point. I&#039;ve never really thought of it in that way, but health should really be very separate from politics - after all, everyone&#039;s in favour of a nation of good health, the only disagreements are about how to get there.  We should be working toward cross-party consensus, and consensus with the staff on the ground.  It has to be said that the latter are largely united anyway, so it&#039;s just a case of marrying that with politicians&#039; views - it will be interesting to see if Alan Johnson moves in that direction.

Of the doctors, nurses, and administration staff, I reckon its the admin people who have the worst time.  I think a great many of them are trying hard to perform the role that they&#039;ve been assigned by the government.  The fact that some of these roles are bureaucratic and pointless isn&#039;t their fault, yet it must give them an utter lack of motivation, and a flood of vitriol from doctors, nurses, the public, and the media.  We need a rationalisation of these roles - give them clearly defined purposes, get them involved on the ground, and give much more of the day-to-day running of hospitals back to clinicians.

Anyway, thanks for a brilliant &#039;rant&#039;!  Certainly given me food for thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gary, </p>
<p>I have to admit that I haven&#8217;t seen Alan Johnson being questioned, but I&#8217;ve read about his plans, and I agree that a year-long consultation is&#8230; unhelpful.  If he reviews services without changing anything, surely morale will stay low for another twelve months, the problems with ST applications for junior doctors will be repeated next year, and &#8211; essentially &#8211; nothing will get done. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I guess it&#8217;s hard to truly tackle a problem without getting your head round the problem as a whole &#8211; chipping round the edges at whatever the <i>Daily Mail</i> has as it&#8217;s latest moan seems to have caused much of the current damage &#8211; but I don&#8217;t understand why a full year of consultation is necessary.  As you rightly say, people know what the problems are already, they just need sorting into a logical form, and sorting ASAP. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re way ahead of me on Norman Lamb&#8230; I have to say I have no idea what the Lib Dem policy is on hospital cleaning, though I probably should!  Having said that, I don&#8217;t know much about any Lib Dem policies at the moment &#8211; I know I thought Sir Menzies would be a good leader, but I&#8217;m starting to agree with his dissenters&#8230; The obvious problem being that there&#8217;s no-one who seems particularly well placed to replace him.  But to the point&#8230; </p>
<p>Wards are currently cleaned by private companies, and it&#8217;s clear that they have more interest in profit than cleanliness, so I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s the right way to go &#8211; unless, of course, you do some kind of privatisation on a national scale, where one company is responsible for cleaning all hospitals.  That would be quite an interesting idea, and could help to relieve some of the strain on the NHS, and some of the difficulties of individual hospitals having to negotiate comparatively tiny contracts.  It would presumably give someone real ownership of the cleanliness problem, which is (I think) the way to get it tackled.</p>
<p>As for &#8216;diverging the health of the nation from politics&#8217; &#8211; that&#8217;s a fab point. I&#8217;ve never really thought of it in that way, but health should really be very separate from politics &#8211; after all, everyone&#8217;s in favour of a nation of good health, the only disagreements are about how to get there.  We should be working toward cross-party consensus, and consensus with the staff on the ground.  It has to be said that the latter are largely united anyway, so it&#8217;s just a case of marrying that with politicians&#8217; views &#8211; it will be interesting to see if Alan Johnson moves in that direction.</p>
<p>Of the doctors, nurses, and administration staff, I reckon its the admin people who have the worst time.  I think a great many of them are trying hard to perform the role that they&#8217;ve been assigned by the government.  The fact that some of these roles are bureaucratic and pointless isn&#8217;t their fault, yet it must give them an utter lack of motivation, and a flood of vitriol from doctors, nurses, the public, and the media.  We need a rationalisation of these roles &#8211; give them clearly defined purposes, get them involved on the ground, and give much more of the day-to-day running of hospitals back to clinicians.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for a brilliant &#8216;rant&#8217;!  Certainly given me food for thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary funston</title>
		<link>http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/06/28/my-first-thoughts-on-browns-cabinet/comment-page-1#comment-70939</link>
		<dc:creator>gary funston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/06/28/my-first-thoughts-on-browns-cabinet#comment-70939</guid>
		<description>As I was watching the health secretary Alan Johnson being questioned today, I felt an overwhelming feeling of frustration. Why he thinks having a year long review of the state of the NHS is necessary is beyond me. He knows, as does everyone else in the country, what the problems are. Instead of buying time and wasting valuable money that could be spent on the NHS itself, is it not wiser that he sorts it out right now.
 I do agree with the lib dem shadow health secretary, Norman Lamb, in that there should be consideration into the proposal of cleanliness in hospitals, to be carried out by a private company. In my view it makes sense. It would relieve the stress on the NHS and make way for improvements elsewhere, which are badly needed.
 It is hard to diverge politics with the health of the nation, as well as the well being of the doctors themselves. But if we can put this right the nation will be able to get back up on its feet, well, one foot at least.
 Also, on another note, the public should take time to think of the Doctors, Nurses, Administration and Support Staff. So many people blame them for the everyday insufficiency, whereas it is the government who is solely to blame. Well , thats my rant over..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was watching the health secretary Alan Johnson being questioned today, I felt an overwhelming feeling of frustration. Why he thinks having a year long review of the state of the NHS is necessary is beyond me. He knows, as does everyone else in the country, what the problems are. Instead of buying time and wasting valuable money that could be spent on the NHS itself, is it not wiser that he sorts it out right now.<br />
 I do agree with the lib dem shadow health secretary, Norman Lamb, in that there should be consideration into the proposal of cleanliness in hospitals, to be carried out by a private company. In my view it makes sense. It would relieve the stress on the NHS and make way for improvements elsewhere, which are badly needed.<br />
 It is hard to diverge politics with the health of the nation, as well as the well being of the doctors themselves. But if we can put this right the nation will be able to get back up on its feet, well, one foot at least.<br />
 Also, on another note, the public should take time to think of the Doctors, Nurses, Administration and Support Staff. So many people blame them for the everyday insufficiency, whereas it is the government who is solely to blame. Well , thats my rant over..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

