Swimming Challenge Videoblog: I’ve done it!
If you want to sponsor me and give some money to Marie Curie Cancer Care, you can do so at sjh.im/SimonSwim. Thanks for your support!
If you want to sponsor me and give some money to Marie Curie Cancer Care, you can do so at sjh.im/SimonSwim. Thanks for your support!
Many thanks to everyone who has donated so far! If you haven’t, and you’d like to donate something to Marie Curie and support my 10k swim, please do at http://sjh.im/SimonSwim. Thanks.
If you want to sponsor me and support Marie Curie, go to http://sjh.im/SimonSwim. Many thanks for your support.
As you’ll see from the above video, I’ve agreed to swim 10k in just over two weeks for Marie Curie Cancer Care. Please sponsor me!
10k is a long way – for those of you in London, it’s roughly the same as swimming along the Thames from the London Eye to the Millennium Dome. It’s 400 lengths of my local pool.
So, please sponsor me! If you gave just 5p per length, that’d be £20, or enough to pay for an hour of nursing care for a terminally ill patient. Even £1 – 1p for every 10m – would pay for a patient information pack.
If you’re still not convinced, look at the video below which explains a small part of the work that Marie Curie nurses do.
I’ll give you regular updates on my progress over the next couple of weeks.
Thanks for your support.
It is surely impossible any West Wing fan – or, indeed, anyone who isn’t a West Wing fan, to keep a straight face whilst watching this from Season 4. If you don’t own it, you can currently buy the whole 43 disc box set for under £40. That’s 26p an episode - how can you resist?
A bit of Tim Minchin to wish everyone “Merry Christmas!”
Five reasons why this video (whilst it makes an important and valid wider point) irritates me:
1. It doesn’t acknowledge that both A (on the left) and B (on the right) are both, ultimately, working for profit rather than purely for the benefit of patients.
2. It doesn’t acknowledge that A likely employs salaried doctors like B, with similar issues.
3. It doesn’t acknowledge that since A opted out of providing out-of-hours care, B has stepped in to provide it. In fact, it’s B who’s illustrated at walking out at the end, just when B’s colleagues are kicking into action.
4. It suggests that non-partner doctors hold less professionalism, and are less concerned with patient welfare. Such doctors include many GPs, as well as virtually all secondary and tertiary care physicians and surgeons.
5. It doesn’t acknowledge a single advantage of the corporate model. A’s approach may well be preferable as a whole, but B’s approach is not without merit, and it’s idiotic to suggest that it is.
I believe this is a BBC film from 1965 about the effects of nuclear war that was suppressed from broadcast. It’s powerful stuff.
I found it fascinating, as I used to be really interested in American Cold War public information films, and the contrast between this and the whole ‘Duck & Cover’ malarky is stark to say the least. I can certainly appreciate why its broadcast was suppressed at the time!
Visit sjhoward.co.uk to see the video which appears here.
Also available on Daily Motion
Full details of 1023 campaign here
I’m being paid to share this remarkably inspiring celebrity-filled video with you – featuring everyone from Tony Blair to June Sarpong, and Stuart Rose to Annie Lennox. Getting all these people to contribute seems quite an impressive achievement, and I hope you enjoy watching.