About me
Archive
About me

Bush, Blair and respect

close

Warning: This post was published more than 12 years ago.

I keep old posts on the site because sometimes it's interesting to read old content. Not everything that is old is bad. Also, I think people might be interested to track how my views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured!

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might have changed in the 12 years since I wrote this post.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Many thanks for your understanding.

I was dismayed to read of Tony Blair being harassed by a member of The Wright Stuff audience on Five.

This is becoming almost a common occurrence — the hostile and cynical TV audience who haven’t a good word to say about anything the Prime Minister does.

I was at the inauguration of President Bush in Washington in January, and the contrast could not be starker. Some 265,000 people on the National Mall saw his swearing in and there was no booing, no slow hand-claps, no irate members of the general public demanding to have their say.

Americans, whether Democrat, Green or Republican, respect the office of the President and the scenes on The Wright Stuff would simply be unthinkable in the US, a nation that falls in line behind its President.

My question for Des Brown: Are you suggesting that challenging the leader in an open forum is a bad thing?

I didn’t see The Wright Stuff, but I did see Talk to the Prime Minister, and I have to say that it did occur to me that the programme was anything but balanced in terms of the selection of speakers. Just a few years ago, this would have been unthinkable – there would doubtless have been comparatively little criticism of the PM.

Yes, we should respect the office of Prime Minister, and perhaps we don’t do this enough. But we shouldn’t end up in an American situation, where to criticise the incumbent President is seen by a large sector of society as unpatriotic criticism of the country as a whole.

I think we are priveledged to be able to broadcast programmes like this, where we see the PM defend himself against the criticisms of the masses, and I think that this should, for the large part, be celebrated, not criticised.

This 376th post was filed under: News and Comment.






More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 7th May 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd April 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 4th March 2017)

France and Belgium’s banned airlines (published 29th August 2005)

What is an extremist? (published 20th July 2005)

Photo-a-day 226: Metromorphosis (published 13th August 2012)

Photo-a-day 70: Home… nearly! (published 13th March 2014)


Comments and responses

No comments or responses to this article have been published yet.

Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.