About me
Archive
About me

Capital punishment

close

Warning: This post was published more than 11 years ago.

I keep old posts on the site because sometimes it's interesting to read old content. Not everything that is old is bad. Also, I think people might be interested to track how my views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured!

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might have changed in the 11 years since I wrote this post.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Many thanks for your understanding.

Following the killing of PC Beshenivsky, several people who should know better have been calling for the reintroduction of the death penalty for those who kill police officers. This is a pretty silly proposal, as anyone with a handful of brain cells can recognise (too harsh?).

First and foremost, why is the death of a police officer any more terrible than the death of someone with a different job? Why is it more terrible than the killing of a child? Heck, why is it more terrible to kill a single police officer than it is to kill a tower block full of civvies? Especially when you consider that police officers are actively remunerated for the risk that they may be harmed on duty?

Secondly, people who kill police, by definition, do not expect to be caught. They’re killing the police either in a moment of clouded judgement or because they think they’re going to get away. No criminal is going to stand there and say ‘Fair cop, guv, slap the ol’ han’cuffs on then’ just because killing a police officer carries the death penalty, because they’re not considering the penalty at the time of the crime.

Thirdly, if we go about killing people based on a single decision taken in a split second, set against the background of their whole life, why are we any better than the criminals?

This proposal serves no serious purpose other than to allow some barbaric form of satisfaction for the bereaved. And, frankly, I thought humanity was better than that.

This 764th post was filed under: News and Comment.






More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 10th July 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 2nd June 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 7th May 2017)

Is a blog still a blog. . . (published 22nd November 2009)

Photo-a-day 277: ThinkPod (published 3rd October 2012)

Diary for 3rd August 2008 (published 3rd August 2008)

Photo-a-day 329: Bassetti (published 25th November 2012)


Comments and responses

Comment from Rory


by Rory

Comment posted at 18:36 on 24th November 2005.

I have to disagree with you. I believe reintroducing capital punishment for certain crimes would help restore “punishment” to the criminal justice system. For too long rehabilitation has dominated – and largely failed.

In killing a police officer you are not only unlawfully killing a person (bad enough!), but killing the very people who daily put their lives in danger to protect the vast majority of citizens who are law-abiding. If you are willing to kill a police officer then I believe you would have no qualms over killing an ‘ordinary’ citizen; furthermore, I think a clear message needs to be sent out that the police do have teeth and can fight back (through the criminal justice system) and are not crippled by the ridiculous human rights legislation we suffer from currently.

For too long figures of authority (teachers, police, etc. and most especially parents) have found themselves weakened by human rights legislation and a softly-softly approach.

It could also be argued that for some criminals it is ridiculous to spend vast sums of money locking them up for their lives when that money could be better spent elsewhere. This is of course likely to provoke a vicious backlash from the Left, however the truth is that when an individual has beaten dozens of people up, stabbed people, raped women, mugged people, and is generally widely-recognised as ‘scum’-like, then I think it is reasonable to enter into a debate on how best to deal with such individuals.


Comment from Anonymous


by Anonymous

Comment posted at 19:42 on 30th November 2005.

A very, very quick point: If death is worse than living with the crime and punishment, why are prison suicide rates so high? The death penalty just gives people an easy way out.


Comment from MIKE


by MIKE

Comment posted at 16:01 on 19th October 2007.

PRISON IS NOT A DETERRANT & TOO MANY LIBERALIST REHABILITATORS ARE OUT THERE WITH SYMPATHIES TOWARDS POOR CRIMINALS TRYING TO GET TOO MANY CRIMNALS OFF THE HOOK-HANG THE BASTARDS IF THE KILL AN EYE FOR AN EYE IS THE BEST BEST JUSTICE


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 18:46 on 25th October 2007.

Mike – Hang which bastards in particular?


Comment from jin


by jin

Comment posted at 06:57 on 5th November 2007.

If a country has its army whether to suppress its people or to fight with that of another country, a country

should have capital punishment. Reason is very ovbious. While killing inocent people abroad if it have chance, why a country cannot kill criminal who commit capital crime?
If a country deny the capital punishment, I think the country have to abandon its army.
As to the possibility of false charge to the capital punishment, you can give 50 lead years to the guilty to hedge the risk.


Trackback from elsewhere on the site



Trackback received at 10:01 on 3rd May 2014.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Drug shortages hamper lethal injections in the USA


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.