About me
About me

MTAS: Ditched. Hewitt: Still on £255,000 a year.


Warning: This post was published more than 10 years ago.

I keep old posts on the site because sometimes it's interesting to read old content. Not everything that is old is bad. Also, I think people might be interested to track how my views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured!

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might have changed in the 10 years since I wrote this post.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Many thanks for your understanding.

Visit sjhoward.co.uk to see the video which appears here.

MTAS has been ditched. It will no longer be used to match junior doctors to specialist training posts. Ministers have realised that it is simply not fit for purpose.

Let me remind you what Patricia Hewitt said on Question Time on BBC One on 8th May 2007 (or remind yourself using the video mini-video on the right, or see the full-size version here):

If a minister is responsible for a major policy blunder or acts unethically then of course they should go.

Patricia Hewitt oversaw the introduction of a massively expensive computer system for matching junior doctors to specialist training posts. It has failed. It has spewed out intimate personal details of applicants onto publicly accessible parts of the web. And now it’s been ditched.

How is that not a ‘major policy blunder’?

This 1,133rd post was filed under: Health, News and Comment.

More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 4th December 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 6th November 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 5th October 2017)

Photo-a-day 3: Glitzen (published 3rd January 2014)

10 million hits (published 28th October 2007)

Sky News: Never wrong for long (published 7th July 2007)

Diary for Sunday, 30th March 2008 (published 30th March 2008)

Comments and responses

Comment from AndrewP

by AndrewP

Comment posted at 15:42 on 16th May 2007.

This is exactly the point I made to Patricia Hewitt in my email to her straight after the Question Time program via their website (when she said she would respond to ALL questions). Perhaps unsuprisingly I have not yet received an answer and my question has so far not been deemed ‘representative enough’ to appear on the website. Either that or she has no reasonable answer!

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

by sjhoward

Comment posted at 07:22 on 17th May 2007.

I’m glad you point out she said she’d answer all the questions – I thought I must have misheard, given that they only put three on the website. Clearly, Patricia Hewitt underestimated the strength of feeling on the issue once again, and didn’t realise she’d get thousands of questions.

Compose a new comment


You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.

The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.