About me
Archive
About me

Philosophy and Su Doku

close

Warning: This post was published more than 11 years ago.

I keep old posts on the site because sometimes it's interesting to read old content. Not everything that is old is bad. Also, I think people might be interested to track how my views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured!

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might have changed in the 11 years since I wrote this post.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Many thanks for your understanding.

As I’ve previously told you (weren’t you listening?!), I have a fairly unhealthy obsession with Su Doku. It’s becoming so much of a national obsession that it’s even featured on Richard and Judy. While I was washing up today, something in my slightly disturbed mind obviously connected this with my recent bordering-on-philosophical comments.

Here’s what popped into my mind: I enjoy Su Doku. The part I enjoy most is the satisfaction of having completed the puzzle. The logical conclusion of this is that I would be happiest with a book of prefilled Su Dokus. But, of course, this misses the point: The completion is only enjoyable as a result of the prior frustration of being unable to solve said puzzle.

So, if the majority of the world’s religions promise that we’ll live happily for eternity, wouldn’t the people in that place be incredibly bored and, ultimately depressed? If they’re all already as happy as they can possibly be, then they have nothing to strive for, nothing to work towards, and nothing to live for. What’s the point of living forever if you’ve nothing to acheive in that time?

Surely a much better place to be would be hell, where you could always have aspirations of having a slightly less hellish time? You’d have something to work towards, each day would have a purpose, and eternal life would have much greater significance and meaning.

Just a thought, straight from my head to yours.

This 577th post was filed under: Headliner.






More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd April 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 4th March 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 6th February 2017)

Summer Books: Living with Teenagers (published 24th August 2008)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd April 2017)

Let’s ditch the word ‘cancer’ (published 31st January 2014)

Gateshead billboard hostage stunt (published 7th August 2010)


Comments and responses

Comment from Maximilian Goldenberg


by Maximilian Goldenberg

Comment posted at 10:58 on 14th May 2005.

You display a total failure of understanding the true nature of Hell.


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 11:30 on 14th May 2005.

The only way you could possibly know the true nature of Hell is if you are there. Otherwise you simply have an opposing belief. And if, indeed, you are in hell, then presumably this site is also there. Makes sense.


Comment from Maximilan Goldenberg


by Maximilan Goldenberg

Comment posted at 14:29 on 15th May 2005.

Nobody goes to Hell unwillingly.

Maybe you should read the book

“Whatever Happened to Hell” by John Blanchard

http://www.evangelicalpress.org/books/Whatever%20happened%20to%20hell.htm

http://www.gnpcb.org/product/0891078371

Or are you too closed-minded to read such books?


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 14:34 on 15th May 2005.

Maybe you should read the book

But which book? Why would I want to limit myself to the Christian interpretations of hell that you present?


Comment from Maximilan Goldenberg


by Maximilan Goldenberg

Comment posted at 17:58 on 15th May 2005.

Who said anything about limiting yourself to reading just one book on the subject, which you then dismiss out of hand.

By your very response it is clear you are limiting yourself, by apparently refusing to even consider reading such a book because of its perspective.


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 18:54 on 15th May 2005.

I’ve read books by authors with many different perspectives. I would not dismiss reading the above book out of hand, I simply questioed whether it was wise to point to just a single book as a source of information.


Trackback from elsewhere on the site



Trackback received at 22:50 on 20th December 2005.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » The Sudoku craze rumbles on


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.