About me
Archive
About me

Thoughts for 27th February 2008

close

Warning: This post was published more than 9 years ago.

I keep old posts on the site because sometimes it's interesting to read old content. Not everything that is old is bad. Also, I think people might be interested to track how my views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured!

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might have changed in the 9 years since I wrote this post.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Many thanks for your understanding.

Cameron suggesting US Presidential style debates is very interesting: It’s the first time the leader in the polls has done so. Encouraging! «

This 1,265th post was filed under: Diary Style Notes.






More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 6th November 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 5th October 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd September 2017)

Microsoft, RSS, and IE7 (published 5th July 2005)

Photo-a-day 288: Millennium rainbow (published 14th October 2012)

FLASH: Cash for Honours file handed to CPS (published 20th April 2007)

On NokiaSoft (published 3rd September 2013)


Comments and responses

Comment from Tim McLoughlin


by Tim McLoughlin

Comment posted at 12:42 on 28th February 2008.

Leaders of the Opposition have been calling for TV debates since the days of Neil Kinnock. The Govt always decline as they have everything to lose and nothing to gain from doing this. They get plenty of solus exposure without needing to get into a dogfight with the opposition.

I agree that it would be a great idea, but turkeys voting for Xmas…

The Indie’s Steve Richards sums it up well
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/steve-richards/steve-richards-a-televised-debate-between-party-leaders-would-be-a-disaster-for-democracy-463908.html


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 21:45 on 28th February 2008.

That’s not really true – John Major, when he was Prime Minister, desperately wanted a televised debate with Tony Blair, but Blair refused. It isn’t the government that has everything to lose, it’s the leader in the polls, for whom the debate can only be (potentially) damaging.

That’s why it’s so interesting that David Cameron, who is clearly ahead in the polls, is now calling for a televised debate.


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.