About me
Bookshop

Get new posts by email.

About me

Underground criminals?

David Mery’s front page piece in today’s Guardian certainly makes for interesting reading – and raises some very valid and important questions about the actions of the police in the wake of the London tube bombings. Well worth reading, and worrying.

This post was filed under: News and Comment.

Recently published posts

I agree with Rishi / 23 April 2024

Holy socks / 22 April 2024

‘Before the Coffee Gets Cold’ by Toshikazu Kawaguchi / 21 April 2024

Out of ideas / 20 April 2024

‘The Reluctant Traveler’ / 19 April 2024

Circled / 18 April 2024




Random posts from the archive

Swing Update / 10 April 2005

Politcal amusement / 08 December 2005

Our children dying because of our embarrassment / 23 July 2006

Rumsfeld / 24 September 2004

I’ve been to visit ‘Gathering Light’ / 27 April 2023

Mad Pat redefines ‘stabilising’ / 07 June 2006




Comments and responses

Comment from A T Hunn


    22.15, 30/09/2005

Look, either you are for the forces of law or you are with the terrorists. Persident Bush has made that very clear, and society must be protected from terrorism by whatever means necessary.

This guy is obviously a subversive whining ingrate and he deserves all the treatment he got. Writing articles about it on the front page of the newspaper shows him to be just another cry baby liberal. But what else do you expect from the Guardian and their columnists?


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


    11.09, 01/10/2005

You say

society must be protected from terrorism by whatever means necessary

But that really means nothing unless you state precisely what you mean by ‘protected’ and by ‘terrorism’…


Comment from A T Hunn


    12.01, 01/10/2005

In its absolute sense, “terrorism” is anything which threatens the rule of law.

“Protected” means using any means at their disposal to prevent the rule of law being threatened.

Obviously 9/11 was not a sufficient wake up call for some people to realize that we are at war, everything changed, and the necessary measures need to be taken. During the war against the Nazis, people accepted without question the need for rationing, identity cards, censorship, and the need to round up enemies of the state and subversives eg communists, ethnic Germans, and Japanese and put them in interment camps. The war on terrorism is no different, and since as our great leaders in thsi crusade against the force of evil have declared, “if you are not with us, you are against us”, those who oppose such measures are revealing themselves to be fifth columnists and are aiding and abetting the terrorists and their cause.




Compose a new comment

I'm not taking comments on my blog any more, so I'm afraid the opportunity to add to this discussion has passed.




The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. Information about cookies and the handling of emails submitted for the 'new posts by email' service can be found in the privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links: if you buy something via a link on this site, I might get a small percentage in commission. Here's hoping.