About me
Archive
About me

Desperate TV chef leaps aboard bandwagon

close

Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 14 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 14 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and wrote about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 14 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find utterly cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

Paul Rankin We’ve had Jamie Oliver and the school food. We’ve had Jamie Oliver and the hospital food. Now it’s Paul Rankin and the care home food.

Aside from the fact that my limited knowledge of TV chefs doesn’t include him, and even aside from the fact that he’s clearly desperate to raise his profile, why’s he bothering making such a fuss when even he admits this:

“The standard was not too bad,” Mr Rankin told BBC News 24. “They had a cook in there cooking everything fresh but there just wasn’t any real emphasis on quality tasty foods.

So he’s not too fussed about the nutritional content of the food, he thinks the standards are quite good, but the food just doesn’t taste quite good enough?! Is this really worthy of a campaign?

It’s not even as if they’re particularly underfunded meals:

Shelia Scott from the National Care Homes Association said its members were already spending a average of £20-£30 a week on meals for each resident.

That’s compared to the £1.85 per week Mr Oliver apparently had to deal with (I can’t say I’m over familiar with his methods, having actually not watched the programme).

So where will the celebrity chefs go next? Gordon Ramsay launching a campaign because the turkey in the Ritz is a bit dry?

This 584th post was filed under: News and Comment.

Some recently published posts

Reflecting on my first ten years as a doctor / June 2019, 8 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / June 2019, 6 minutes long

Californian taxis, gun ownership and democracy / May 2019, 9 minutes long

The assassination of JFK / May 2019, 6 minutes long

Crossing the US-Mexico border / May 2019, 10 minutes long

Some random old posts

2,400 attacks in four months / May 2005, Less than a minute long

Howard concedes Tories may not win election / January 2005, Less than a minute long

NatWest Customer Charter ad banned by ASA / February 2012, 2 minutes long

Casting yourself as the baddie / January 2012, Less than a minute long

Most Entertaining Site of Today / January 2004, Less than a minute long

How Aaron Sorkin ruined politics / September 2012, Less than a minute long


Comments and responses

Comment from Alfred the Bread Burner


by Alfred the Bread Burner

Comment posted at 14:14 on 15th May 2005.

It is high time that an in depth analysis by a qualified celebrity chef was done on the abysmal state of food being provided to England’s deprived and neglected prisoners currently doing time at Her Majesty’s pleasure in the many penal institutions throughout the kingdom.

Remember —

“A well fed convict is a happy convict!”

and one is who is less likely to re-offend.


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 14:25 on 15th May 2005.

They couldn’t possibly do that – it’s the Daily Mail crowd they like to appeal to, and I doubt the Mail would support anything more than gruel being given to ‘evil’ prisoners.

As for crime in general, my car’s been broken into overnight, and the stereo stolen. I rang the police to report it, and the staff member took lots of details. Then phoned back half an hour later to take a description of the car and it’s registration number, which she’d forgotten to ask.

I was told that a policeman would call me back ‘soon’ to take more details – that was several hours ago.

Quality policing.


Comment from Maximilan Goldenberg


by Maximilan Goldenberg

Comment posted at 17:50 on 15th May 2005.

Sorry to hear about your material loss.

Realistically, do you think that Durham County Constabulary will be motivated to spend much time on a crime which they have almost no hope of solving and where the victim was a student, a temporary member of the community, who in the eyes of the Establishment, is part of the scrounging classes and of a group who causes trouble with excessive drunken behavior and unwelcome political demonstrations, and thus deserve anything coming to them?

The police are very busy and by troubling them with such details, you are taking them away from their coffee and donuts.


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 18:59 on 15th May 2005.

Well, as it happens, they’ve been rather more efficient than their first impression implied. They have sent round a lovely policewoman, who has dusted extensively for fingerprints, and is now toddling off back to her station where she will formalise a report, before getting back to me with a crime number and any more details I can supply.

The lovely people at Zurich car insurance and AutoGlass have also been very helpful in repairing my car such that I was back on the road, so to speak, within hours of discovering the damage.

All-in-all, I’ve been rather impressed by the level of efficiency in the system, even if I was a little perturbed by the response of the law enforcement officer this morning.


Comment from Emanuel Goldstein


by Emanuel Goldstein

Comment posted at 19:50 on 15th May 2005.

“They have sent round a lovely policewoman”

Did you ask her out to dinner?


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 22:23 on 15th May 2005.

When I said ‘lovely’, I meant ‘friendly’ and ‘courteous’. She was approximately twice my age. I did not ask her out to dinner.


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.