About me
Sponsor my Channel Swim
About me

Weekend read: I oppose tax breaks for marriage

Wedding ring

Regular readers will know that I love a contrarian column, and Laurie Penny’s piece for the New Statesman is a corker of an example. In it, she argues that marriage is an archaic minority interest, and asks

Why should I subsidise other people’s weird lifestyle choices?

I suspect that Penny’s intention may have been to generate heat at least as much as light, but it’s an interesting (and somewhat convincing) argument nevertheless. It’s well worth reading this weekend.

Photo posted on Flickr by Lee J Haywood and used here under Creative Commons sharealike licence.

This 2,110th post was filed under: Weekend Reads, , .

More posts worth reading

The gathering storm of the next NHS crisis (published 9th August 2015)

Netflix might tell us why the election polls were wrong (published 26th May 2015)

James is wrong about giving 16- and 17-year-olds the vote (published 3rd May 2015)

Final result (published 20th June 2005)

Fox News (published 2nd July 2004)

Photo-a-day 139: Fire engine (published 18th May 2012)

Desktop app of the week: Delibar (published 27th June 2012)

Comments and responses

No comments or responses to this article have been published yet.

Compose a new comment


You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.

The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.