About me
Archive
About me

Photo-a-day 257: Potts drum clock

20120913-221146.jpg

This is a drum clock manufactured by Potts for the concourse at Newcastle Station, where it still hangs today. It’s about 120 years old or thereabouts. For a long time after I first moved to Newcastle, this clock had no hands. I don’t know whether it was broken and later repaired, or whether the hands were removed for restoration. But after what seemed like years of it being a broken clock, I remember being somewhat surprised to find it in full working order one day.

One of the more widely circulated pictures from the large storms that have battered Tyneside in the last few months is this shot of the very same clock, in which the roof of the station is leaking to such a degree that it looks like it’s raining inside!

This 1,808th post was filed under: Photo-a-day 2012, .






More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 6th February 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 31st December 2016)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 30th November 2016)

Acronyms and etymology (published 15th February 2013)

Dubya’s guide to the office (published 17th April 2005)

Photo-a-day 351: Roll on the spring! (published 17th December 2012)

Jon Stewart takes on Crossfire (published 10th April 2006)


Comments and responses

Comment from Michael Potts


by Michael Potts

Comment posted at 23:13 on 7th October 2012.

Very interesting photo and comment. The only aspect of the restoration is that the design of the original hands wasn’t used when the new hands were made. All Victorian clock-makers were known principally by the design of the hands, particularly when the name of the firm making the clock wasn’t shown on the dial. From old postcards it looks as though the words “Potts & Sons” and “Leeds” were painted on the dials when the clocks were installed.


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 16:30 on 10th October 2012.

That’s interesting – I wonder what happened to the original hands? I can’t imagine them just falling off, but if they were intentionally removed, it seems odd that they were lost. I wonder why they didn’t use the original design in the restoration? I suppose it could be a cost issue, but then I’d have thought that clock hands like this would have to be bespoke anyway, so where’s the advantage in making them different?


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.