About me
Archive
About me

Blair to face charges over Stockwell?

close

Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 12 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 12 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and wrote about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 12 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find utterly cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

Sir Ian Blair

Yesterday’s Observer (no surprises that it was them) splashed on the story that Sir Ian Blair could face charges over the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes on 21st July last year, based on the fact that the Crown Prosecution Service’s analysis of events focuses on Sir Ian and two other senior commanders. This is, of course, in addition to the ongoing inquiry as to whether Sir Ian misled the public in the aftermath of the attacks of 7th July. And, one year on, it would appear that suspects are still being shot without warning.

Now, I’m fairly certain that Sir Ian has acted wrongly at various points in the aftermath of 7th July, but I don’t think he’s done so knowingly, and I don’t think he’s deliberately set out to cause harm and mislead the public. I don’t think that charging him with any kind of offence is going to serve a great purpose here. He should have resigned, as he’s at least nominally in charge of officers who killed an innocent man, but I don’t think that can be blamed on him per sé.

It would appear to my uniformed self that what’s going on here is that too many police are being handed guns with too little training and too much emotion. The government is all too keen to get armed police on the streets so that it looks like they’re doing something in the face of an apparent terrorist threat, and this results in armed officers needing to be trained quickly, churning out like sausages in a sausage factory. But I wouldn’t want to be confronted by a sausage with a gun: If police are going to carry guns, they should be very highly trained, not just in how to use them, but more importantly in how and when not to use them.

It seems to me that such training either isn’t happening, or isn’t sufficient. Charging Sir Ian Blair with health and safety offences for failing in his duty of care won’t change that. A change in police and government culture – rather more difficult to achieve – just might.

This 883rd post was filed under: News and Comment.

Some recently published posts

Knowledge and understanding / April 2019, 7 minutes long

‘Inappropriate’ A&E attendances / April 2019, 3 minutes long

Cruise ships and me / April 2019, 6 minutes long

Some thoughts on print newspapers / April 2019, 5 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / April 2019, 4 minutes long

Some random old posts

Education reforms / March 2006, 2 minutes long

Fathers group in Downing St stunt / February 2005, 1 minute long

Google acts against comment spammers / January 2005, Less than a minute long

No election TV debate, says Blair / January 2005, Less than a minute long

ICE campaign / July 2005, 5 minutes long

Because we can’t get enough of “Come Hither Bill” / January 2005, Less than a minute long


Comments and responses

No comments or responses to this post have been published yet.

Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.