About me
Archive
About me

Citizen Journalism

close

Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 12 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. Not everything that is old is bad. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured.

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might very well have changed in the 12 years since I wrote this post. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find pretty embarrassing today.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

I'm sorry... But that's the wrong answerBeing the Prediction Expert – nay, Deity – that I am, I feel it’s my duty to share with you my one random prediction for 2006.  But first, let’s review what I said on January 4th 2005 – precisely one year ago today…

MSN is my ‘big tip’ for 2005… Google could be seriously threatened

Let’s all celebrate how wrong that prediction was… MSN has made big leaps forward since January 2005, but it’s not even close to challenging Google’s dominance in the search marketplace.  But as the Google behemoth is increasingly questioned by the internet community at large in the same way that Microsoft began to be questioned in the 90s, perhaps this is the moment for some other internet technology to break through and change the internet in the same way that Google did.  Indeed, business experts already report the beginnings of a second dot-com bubble.

Some say that citizen journalism will change the face of the web and the news media.  That, as far as I can see, is a load of bollocks.  Not to put too fine a point on it, of course.  But, frankly, idiots like me spouting ‘news’ and half-baked opinions and predictions (see above for example), however loud we shout, are never going to rival the newsgathering power of organisations like the Beeb.  Yes, quality citizen journalism brings a personal aspect to the news – you just have to read some personal accounts written by those caught up in th 2004 tsunami or the 7th July London Bombings to realise that.  But as more and more sites like mine spring up, where the uninformed essentially pontificate on the day’s news of which they are hardly informed themselves, the genuine wheat becomes harder to separate from the ever-increasing chaff, and the value of citizen journalism as a whole declines.

The blog is distinctly not the killer application of the web.  But what is? 

How the hell should I know?

This 787th post was filed under: News and Comment.

More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd December 2018)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd November 2018)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 6th October 2018)

Appearing on Newsnight (published 25th January 2005)

Photo-a-day 259: Northumberlandia (published 15th September 2012)

Photo-a-day 44: Postbox (and some related questions) (published 13th February 2012)

Blair is election liability, warn Labour aides (published 27th February 2005)


Comments and responses

No comments or responses to this article have been published yet.

Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.