About me

Get new posts by email.

About me

Dirty Government incentivised

Hold up!

See that little date above?

This post was published years ago.

My opinions have changed over time: I think it's quite fun to keep old posts online so that you can see how that has happened. The downside is that there are posts on this site that express views that I now find offensive, or use language in ways I'd never dream of using it today.

I don't believe in airbrushing history, but I do believe that it's important to acknowledge the obvious: some of what I've written in the past has been crap. Some of it was offensive. Some of it was offensively bad. And there's may be some brass among the muck (you can make up your own mind on that).

Some of what I've presented as my own views has been me—wittingly or unwittingly—posturing without having considered all the facts. In a few years, I'll probably think the same about what I'm writing today, and I'm fine with that. Things change. People grow. Society moves forward.

The internet moves on too, which means there might be broken links or embedded content that fails to load. If you're unlucky, that might mean that this post makes no sense at all.

So please consider yourself duly warned: this post is an historical artefact. It's not an exposition of my current views nor a piece of 'content' than necessarily 'works'.

You may now read on... and in most cases, the post you're about to read is considerably shorter than this warning box, so brace for disappointment.

I’ve pointed out before that, for me, one of the worst aspects of the Blair government is that ministers who resign in disgrace are almost invariably rehired, making a mockery of the idea of resigning because it’s the ‘right thing to do’, and removing all honour associated with standing down because you’re not worthy of office. What had never occured to me until today, thanks to a good journo asking an intelligent question of the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesperson, is that these ministers get payoffs for resigning from their posts, and then get rehired. And, on top of that, there’s not any wish to reform the system.

So not only is there no honour to resigning in disgrace any more, but it’s actually incentivised. The politician who’s done something so inescapably bad that they are forced into resigning gets a nice fat pay-off, and then is rehired. So they are, effectively, paid for being naughty. Even Dr Tanya Byron can see that’s not a good idea. And, frankly, it’s disgraceful.

Look at Estelle Morris, for example. Her mistakes put thousands of teenagers’ life plans off course, and caused untold worry and stress in families across the country. So she resigns, apparently very sorry for the mess she’s made. And I truly believe she was sorry – she seems a very open and honest woman. And yet, I guess it’s not all that difficult to be truly sorry when you know you’re going to get a nice big pay-off and a job back in government, with the associated huge salary, within a matter of months.

Tony Blair may have aspired to heading the washing-powder ‘whiter-than-white’ government, but his government is, at the very least, as soiled as the last. He should be ashamed.

This post was filed under: Politics.

Recently published posts

Weeknotes 2022.03 / 23 January 2022

Weeknotes 2022.02 / 16 January 2022

Weeknotes 2022.01 / 09 January 2022

Five links worth clicking / 07 January 2022

31 things I learned in December 2020 / 31 December 2021

What I’ve been reading this month / 27 December 2021

Random posts from the archive

Comments and responses

Comment from Engelbert Goldstein

    23.33, 25/06/2005

“at the very least, as soiled as the last.”

It has taken you long enough to realize that.

And no mention of the adulterer Blunket resigning, getting his GBP 18 000 resignation bonus, and then within months, getting a high paying cabinet position once again.

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

    15.38, 26/06/2005

Blunkett is the example cited by the journo questioning the PMOS, but I thought Ms Morris was a rather better example, as her failure was in her direct responsibilities as a minister rather than simply the moral code by which misiters are expected to conduct themselves. And as for taking a while – I’ve never claimed to be quick on the uptake!

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

    15.47, 26/06/2005

Those readers who aren’t familiar with the work of Dr Tanya Byron, referred to above, click here for her biog.

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

2nd November 2005.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Blunkett resigns. Again.

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

16th April 2006.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Mr Smith’s arrest in cash-for-honours scandal

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

25th June 2007.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Sacked minister rehired: The same old New Labour

Compose a new comment

I'm not taking comments on my blog any more, so I'm afraid the opportunity to add to this discussion has passed.

The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. Information about cookies and the handling of emails submitted for the 'new posts by email' service can be found in the privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links: if you buy something via a link on this site, I might get a small percentage in commission. Here's hoping.