About me
About me

Dirty Government incentivised


Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 14 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 14 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and wrote about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 14 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find utterly cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

I’ve pointed out before that, for me, one of the worst aspects of the Blair government is that ministers who resign in disgrace are almost invariably rehired, making a mockery of the idea of resigning because it’s the ‘right thing to do’, and removing all honour associated with standing down because you’re not worthy of office. What had never occured to me until today, thanks to a good journo asking an intelligent question of the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesperson, is that these ministers get payoffs for resigning from their posts, and then get rehired. And, on top of that, there’s not any wish to reform the system.

So not only is there no honour to resigning in disgrace any more, but it’s actually incentivised. The politician who’s done something so inescapably bad that they are forced into resigning gets a nice fat pay-off, and then is rehired. So they are, effectively, paid for being naughty. Even Dr Tanya Byron can see that’s not a good idea. And, frankly, it’s disgraceful.

Look at Estelle Morris, for example. Her mistakes put thousands of teenagers’ life plans off course, and caused untold worry and stress in families across the country. So she resigns, apparently very sorry for the mess she’s made. And I truly believe she was sorry – she seems a very open and honest woman. And yet, I guess it’s not all that difficult to be truly sorry when you know you’re going to get a nice big pay-off and a job back in government, with the associated huge salary, within a matter of months.

Tony Blair may have aspired to heading the washing-powder ‘whiter-than-white’ government, but his government is, at the very least, as soiled as the last. He should be ashamed.

This 641st post was filed under: Politics.

Some recently published posts

What I’ve been reading this month / January 2020, 11 minutes long

The Tyne Pedestrian and Cycle Tunnels: eight years on / January 2020, 8 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / January 2020, 7 minutes long

Faber Stories / December 2019, 4 minutes long

My favourite books of 2016 / December 2019, 26 minutes long

Some random old posts

The sheer bloody idiocy of medical journals / January 2012, 7 minutes long

Imagining the post-antibiotics future / December 2013, Less than a minute long

Blair stays on holiday but gives £15m aid / December 2004, 1 minute long

Blood donation by numbers / December 2012, Less than a minute long

BBC censorship / June 2005, 3 minutes long

The best Europe we’ve ever had / November 2014, Less than a minute long

Comments and responses

Comment from Engelbert Goldstein

by Engelbert Goldstein

Comment posted at 23:33 on 25th June 2005.

“at the very least, as soiled as the last.”

It has taken you long enough to realize that.

And no mention of the adulterer Blunket resigning, getting his GBP 18 000 resignation bonus, and then within months, getting a high paying cabinet position once again.

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

by sjhoward

Comment posted at 15:38 on 26th June 2005.

Blunkett is the example cited by the journo questioning the PMOS, but I thought Ms Morris was a rather better example, as her failure was in her direct responsibilities as a minister rather than simply the moral code by which misiters are expected to conduct themselves. And as for taking a while – I’ve never claimed to be quick on the uptake!

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

by sjhoward

Comment posted at 15:47 on 26th June 2005.

Those readers who aren’t familiar with the work of Dr Tanya Byron, referred to above, click here for her biog.

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

Trackback received at 15:49 on 2nd November 2005.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Blunkett resigns. Again.

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

Trackback received at 00:20 on 16th April 2006.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Mr Smith’s arrest in cash-for-honours scandal

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

Trackback received at 02:33 on 25th June 2007.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Sacked minister rehired: The same old New Labour

Compose a new comment


You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.

The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.