About me
Bookshop

Get new posts by email.

About me

The Da Vinci Code (Dan Brown)

I just finished reading this a couple of days ago. It was a fairly enjoyable book, but it certainly wasn’t as fantastic as some of the newspaper reviews would have you believe. There were parts that stretched believability to new lengths, and the whole thing was fairly predictable. Having said that, the mix of fact, superstition, legend, and fiction works surprisingly well, and I did learn a thing or two about art from reading this book. It was just disappointing that the author felt the need to leave so many clues as to the ending that it was hard not to guess.

It is something of a formulaic bestseller, a sentiment beautifully expressed by Mark Lawson:

Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code, 450 pages of irritatingly gripping tosh…

It’s certainly worth reading, but don’t expect a masterpiece.

I read the ebook version, since most of the books I read now are in that format. It’s one of the many uses of my Pocket PC. But you can buy the paperback from Amazon.co.uk by clicking on the graphic above.

And if you want to join the sjhoward.co.uk book club (!), or basically just read the same books as me, I’m currently working my way through Shooting History: A Personal Journey by Jon Snow, The Guardian Year 2004 edited by Martin Woollacott, and The Phantom of the Opera by Gaston Leroux (which is an absolute bargain).

This post was filed under: Book Club.

Recently published posts

What I’ve been reading this month / 30 June 2022

Weeknotes 2022.25 / 26 June 2022

Weeknotes 2022.24 / 19 June 2022

Weeknotes 2022.23 / 12 June 2022

Weeknotes 2022.22 / 05 June 2022

31 things I learned in May 2021 / 31 May 2022




Random posts from the archive

Scrabo Tower / 13 April 2019

Review: The Sins of the Father by Jeffrey Archer / 31 October 2012

WD-40 / 19 January 2005

Charles does a Jack / 08 April 2005

Fathers group in Downing St stunt / 28 February 2005

Review: Them by Jon Ronson / 15 August 2012




Comments and responses

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


    23.36, 28/02/2006

The Times’s review:

the silliest, most inaccurate, ill-informed, stereotype-driven, cloth-eared, cardboard-cutout-populated piece of pulp fiction that I have read

Slightly harsher than ‘utterly gripping tosh’, then.


Comment from Kaedn


    12.41, 22/06/2011

Many many quality pinots there.




Compose a new comment

I'm not taking comments on my blog any more, so I'm afraid the opportunity to add to this discussion has passed.




The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. Information about cookies and the handling of emails submitted for the 'new posts by email' service can be found in the privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links: if you buy something via a link on this site, I might get a small percentage in commission. Here's hoping.