About me
About me



Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 13 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 13 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and wrote about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 13 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find utterly cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

David Cameron has started vlogging, or video-blogging, or YouTubing, or whatever the heck it’s called these days. It really is a masterstroke. Webcameron is an excellent idea.

It’s certainly caused something of a stir in the blogosphere: James O’Malley rather enjoyed it, I think:

The first thing that struck me about this was why is the Leader of the Opposition, a man who earns £127,000 a year, doing the washing up by hand? Surely he owns a dishwasher? Even the proletariat can afford a dishwasher these days! Surely this little piece to camera wasn’t all stage managed?

The other thing that annoyed me about the video was that there was no pay-off. Having watched a lot of videos on the internet, I was expecting it to all build up to something. I thought towards the end he was going to shout “SHUT THE FUCK UP, KIDS!” Disappointing.

Nathan Nelson is possibly even more cynical:

I use Ecover as I am a left-wing Guardian-reading wooly liberal who thinks he can save the planet by buying Ecover products – presumably, I was supposed to see Dave using Ecover and welcome his to my bosom immediately as a kindred spirit.

And Pal makes an even better point:

Crumbs! Dave nearly does the washing up! His hands don’t get wet – he just waves his green washing up liquid around a bit.

But what none of these blogs mention is that they – just like me – are doing exactly what the Conservatives want. We’re talking about them. Whether we think Webcameron is the best idea since sliced bread, or whether we think it’s carefully crafted and stage managed as to mean nothing, the fact is that it’s generating a Conservative buzz. Looking at the Technorati stats, Conservative Party is being blogged a hell of a lot more than Labour Party, and (so the theory goes) if we’re talking about the Conservatives, we’re probably listening to a little of their policy. And maybe even warming to them a little.

It’s exactly where Labour have gone wrong with Dave the Chameleon. That’s a cute character, which at a glance actually makes you think favourably of the Conservatives. Only people who stick around to listen to the full message get the criticism – and few bother. The Conservatives, on the other hand, give a positive impression at first glance – though arguably fall down on policy. But no-one’s listening by that stage anyway.

Cameron is playing a blinder. And I mean Cameron. This is the land of ‘Brand Cameron’. The Webcameron site has no Conservative branding. This is about selling him, not the party, and it’s working. Labour’s playing catch-up. The longer Blair remains as a drag on the Labour party, the bigger the lead Cameron gets. Gordon Brown, or whoever turns out to be the next Labour leader, needs to pull something pretty spectacular out of the bag if they’re to take on Mr Cameron. The next election could be very interesting.

This 974th post was filed under: News and Comment, Politics.

Some recently published posts

What I’ve been reading this month / January 2020, 11 minutes long

The Tyne Pedestrian and Cycle Tunnels: eight years on / January 2020, 8 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / January 2020, 7 minutes long

Faber Stories / December 2019, 4 minutes long

My favourite books of 2016 / December 2019, 26 minutes long

Some random old posts

Robin Cook MP has died / August 2005, Less than a minute long

8-foot giant and 3-foot dwarf present ITV news / April 2007, Less than a minute long

Swing Update / April 2005, Less than a minute long

A united cabinet? / September 2006, Less than a minute long

Star Wars / July 2004, Less than a minute long

To pin or not to pin? A timely question… / November 2006, 2 minutes long

Comments and responses

Comment from Nathan Nelson

by Nathan Nelson

Comment posted at 12:21 on 2nd October 2006.

Thanks for quoting me. Not quite sure what a Conservative buzz is, but it sounds a bit scary, or maybe like a rather unadventurous haircut.

I don’t agree that it takes listening to the end of Dave the Chameleon to get the message – the chameleon image is pretty self-explanatory. I would concede however that people will turn off Dave the Chameleon, and Dave on his webcam in his kitchen, because they are bored of politicians and political parties in general. Dave has suggested he wants to address that, but to an old cynic like me, he has shot himself in the foot slightly by talking about gaining the trust of the electorate and coming across as honest, and all about the policies, in a painfully stage-managed exercise. Still, all credit to him for trying.

‘Brand Cameron’ is what concerns me – here is an ex-PR guy, he’s all about the image, and his ‘stunts’ in the past (biking in to work with his shoes following him in a Lexus, and jetting to Norway to admire melting glaciers) have shown that there isn’t always the substance behind the image. What’s even worse is that appealing to voters on the basis of Cameron as an individual is moving further towards a worryingly presidential style of politics already being played by Blair, and obfuscating the fact that behind Cameron, there’s still a rather unimpressive Conservative Party who seem to be keeping very quiet and hoping no-one will notice them.

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

by sjhoward

Comment posted at 09:32 on 4th October 2006.

I agree with you that what Cameron is doing is not a good thing, and leads to poor Presidential-style government, but I do think it’s good tactics, that might well see him elected. And isn’t that the endgame?

Comment from Dave the Chameleon

by Dave the Chameleon

Comment posted at 19:59 on 13th October 2006.

Well done Simon, a fine spoof site.

May I just draw your reader’s attention to another excellent one ?


best wishes

Dave the Chameleon

Comment from Nathan

by Nathan

Comment posted at 20:00 on 13th October 2006.

That is a particularly blatant bit of self promotion by the Chameleon.

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

by sjhoward

Comment posted at 15:29 on 14th October 2006.

Probably, but I’m enjoying the irony that someone’s trying to promote the site under a post that criticises that very same site. If you’re going to spam, at least spam well.

Compose a new comment


You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.

The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.