About me
Archive
About me

Newspaper misspells own name in masthead

close

Warning: This post was published more than 9 years ago.

I keep old posts on the site because sometimes it's interesting to read old content. Not everything that is old is bad. Also, I think people might be interested to track how my views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured!

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might have changed in the 9 years since I wrote this post.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Many thanks for your understanding.

Valley News's front-page oopsie.

Valley News's front-page oopsie.

It seems that the New Hampshire-based Valley News managed to misspell its own title on its own masthead on Monday by appending a superfluous ‘s’. Quite impressive stuff and, rather extraordinarily, not spotted by anybody involved in the production process.

No doubt if I owned a newspaper, stuff like that woud be happening all the time. But perhaps that’s not surprising given that I come from the home of the Southport Visiter, consistently misspelled for 164 years, and read theguardian – a paper not best known for its spellchecker, and whose spaceless nonsense masthead has fascinated me since its introduction.

On a more serious note, with editors everywhere laying off subeditors, claiming that they are no longer relevant or necessary in the multimedia newsroom, could there be a more prominent, clear demonstration that the role is still vital?

Without subs, accuracy suffers, whether it be grammatical or factual. And in the ever-more competitive world, where the internet means that CP Scott’s maxim that “Comment is free, but facts are sacred” has never been more true, what do newspapers have on their side, if not accuracy?

This 1,358th post was filed under: Headliner, , , , , , .






More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 6th November 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 5th October 2017)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd September 2017)

The new Guardian (published 9th September 2005)

Diary for 17th November 2008 (published 17th November 2008)

Photo-a-day 20: Fog on the Tyne (published 20th January 2014)

Photo-a-day 58: St George and St Athanasius Cathedral (published 27th February 2012)


Comments and responses

Comment from Michael West


by Michael West

Comment posted at 12:06 on 11th August 2008.

That’s quite a specimen indeed.

But while I appreciate that a lot of arguably literate people confuse a “masthead” with a “nameplate” (or “banner”, or “flag”), the problem is this: If you call the nameplate the “masthead”, then what the hell do you call the masthead?

Please get back to me with an answer.


Comment from kadri azharuddin


by kadri azharuddin

Comment posted at 10:52 on 28th January 2009.

Cool . . . . !

this is a new thing which i came across in a publication where language and spelling plays an important role.

I think this is not a mistake hope this might be a PR strategy which you can say may be a negative PR strategy so that people must know about the product.

Can you reply me that y they have done this or at what percent do you agree with my statement


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.