About me
About me

Iran, the Navy, and BBC News 24


Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 13 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 13 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and wrote about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 13 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find utterly cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

BBC News 24 coverageIt strikes me as interesting today that BBC News 24 is referring to Iran’s detention of 15 Royal Navy personnel as a “kidnapping”, which seems to me to be extremely loaded language.

Iran contests that the boats involved in the incident were in Iranian waters, while the UK and US state that they were within Iraqi territory, so it appears one word against another. If the Iranians are right (and it is very hard to tell in such disputed territory with complex divisions), then they are well within their legal rights to detain the Royal Navy personnel, so to describe them as “kidnapped” in this rather less-than-clear situation seems unfortunate at best.

Most other news organisations – including their own website – are using diplomatic terms like “seized” or “detained” which, in themselves, do not imply that either side is right. So why is BBC News 24 deliberately choosing to do differently? I hope, not least for the renowned journalistic standards of the Beeb, that this wasn’t a decision taken because “kidnapped” fits better on a headline graphic.

Some of their presentation decisions are already irritating and somewhat questionable, but if presentation is the reason for this decision, then standards really have reached a new – very depressing – low.

Image courtesy of dragonhhjh at TV Forum

This 1,087th post was filed under: Media, News and Comment, Politics.

Some recently published posts

A €38m lesson with my latte / March 2020, 11 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / March 2020, 14 minutes long

Interesting… isch. / February 2020, 3 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / February 2020, 13 minutes long

La Sagrada Família / February 2020, 21 minutes long

Some random old posts

Howard urges limits on ‘too easy’ abortions / March 2005, 2 minutes long

Fox-Hunting / September 2004, 2 minutes long

Newsweek’s ‘lasting damage’ / June 2005, 4 minutes long

Dirty Government incentivised / June 2005, 2 minutes long

The new terror alert system in full / July 2006, 3 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / March 2017, 3 minutes long

Comments and responses

Comment from Ken from Glos

by Ken from Glos

Comment posted at 20:37 on 25th March 2007.

Dont be so diplomatic.The rules of engagement put our troops in harms way and that is down to this dreadful government.Dont forget this is the second time this has happened and according to Hoon it would never happen again.

Comment from Mort Karman

by Mort Karman

Comment posted at 00:49 on 26th March 2007.

With the modern GPS tracking systems the U.K, U.S. and even the Iranian navy have it should not be difficult to determine exactly who was where. So far, no one has been hurt and I hope it stays that way. Once the logistics are determined which ever side was wrong can say “sorry”. The British sailors can go back to their ship and if it is done correctly it might even bring the tensions between Iran and the U.K-U.S. down a notch.
As far as the BBC reporting goes, they have been accused of pro Arab bias by some pro Israel groups and pro Israel bias by pro Arab groups, so I guess they are trying todo it right. The BBC is far from perfect, and they are not as good as they were years ago, but they are still the very best news operation in the entire world, bar none.
I can say this with some expertise as a winner of several major journalism prizes in over 40 years of print, radio and television journalism. As part of the KIMN Radio, Denver, Colorado news team, I shared in two Edward R, Morrow broadcast journalism awards. I have a first place news photography award from the Oklahoma Press Association and a host of other good stuff. I was not always a grump old man. (my wife says I was once a grumpy young man)
I think the Zenith of the BBC war coverage was during the Falkland war, but that is strictly my own opinion.
BBC correspondents go into harms way every day in some of the most dangerous places in the world to bring accurate news reports to the public. A BBC reporter is currently missing and presumed kidnapped in Gaza as I write this.
The best we can hope for in this Iran-vs. Royal navy situation is that cool heads prevail on both sides, though I realize it may be too much to hope for.

Comment from Margaret

by Margaret

Comment posted at 11:00 on 30th March 2007.

The Government needs to use every diplomatic means at their disposal to free the 15 Navy Crews captured by the Iranians.. They need to open their eyes in my opinion,to the fact that Iran might want to war with them over the Iraqi and nuclear weapons issues and will try every trick possible to trigger a war. For peace sake do not fall into the trap.

Compose a new comment


You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.

The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.