About me
Archive
About me

MTAS: Ditched. Hewitt: Still on £255,000 a year.

close

Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 11 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. Not everything that is old is bad. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have mellowed and matured.

But given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views might very well have changed in the 11 years since I wrote this post. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find pretty embarrassing today.
  • This post might use language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate or offensive.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken; embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

[flashvideo filename=”http://sjhoward.co.uk/video/pat.flv” size=”small” picture=”http://sjhoward.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/hewitt.PNG” /]

MTAS has been ditched. It will no longer be used to match junior doctors to specialist training posts. Ministers have realised that it is simply not fit for purpose.

Let me remind you what Patricia Hewitt said on Question Time on BBC One on 8th May 2007 (or remind yourself using the video mini-video on the right, or see the full-size version here):

If a minister is responsible for a major policy blunder or acts unethically then of course they should go.

Patricia Hewitt oversaw the introduction of a massively expensive computer system for matching junior doctors to specialist training posts. It has failed. It has spewed out intimate personal details of applicants onto publicly accessible parts of the web. And now it’s been ditched.

How is that not a ‘major policy blunder’?

This 1,133rd post was filed under: Health, News and Comment.

More posts worth reading

What I’ve been reading this month (published 3rd May 2018)

What I’ve been reading this month (published 1st April 2018)

World TB Day (published 24th March 2018)

Photo-a-day 98: Boats on the Broads (published 7th April 2012)

How a gun-loving Texan girl came to fear guns (published 8th March 2013)

Debunking the D-Notice meme (published 19th March 2012)

Transmission impossible (published 5th March 2005)


Comments and responses

Comment from AndrewP


by AndrewP

Comment posted at 15:42 on 16th May 2007.

This is exactly the point I made to Patricia Hewitt in my email to her straight after the Question Time program via their website (when she said she would respond to ALL questions). Perhaps unsuprisingly I have not yet received an answer and my question has so far not been deemed ‘representative enough’ to appear on the website. Either that or she has no reasonable answer!


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


by sjhoward

Comment posted at 07:22 on 17th May 2007.

I’m glad you point out she said she’d answer all the questions – I thought I must have misheard, given that they only put three on the website. Clearly, Patricia Hewitt underestimated the strength of feeling on the issue once again, and didn’t realise she’d get thousands of questions.


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.