About me
Archive
About me

Philosophy and Su Doku

close

Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 15 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 15 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and write about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 15 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find utterly cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

As I’ve previously told you (weren’t you listening?!), I have a fairly unhealthy obsession with Su Doku. It’s becoming so much of a national obsession that it’s even featured on Richard and Judy. While I was washing up today, something in my slightly disturbed mind obviously connected this with my recent bordering-on-philosophical comments.

Here’s what popped into my mind: I enjoy Su Doku. The part I enjoy most is the satisfaction of having completed the puzzle. The logical conclusion of this is that I would be happiest with a book of prefilled Su Dokus. But, of course, this misses the point: The completion is only enjoyable as a result of the prior frustration of being unable to solve said puzzle.

So, if the majority of the world’s religions promise that we’ll live happily for eternity, wouldn’t the people in that place be incredibly bored and, ultimately depressed? If they’re all already as happy as they can possibly be, then they have nothing to strive for, nothing to work towards, and nothing to live for. What’s the point of living forever if you’ve nothing to acheive in that time?

Surely a much better place to be would be hell, where you could always have aspirations of having a slightly less hellish time? You’d have something to work towards, each day would have a purpose, and eternal life would have much greater significance and meaning.

Just a thought, straight from my head to yours.

This 576th post was filed under: Miscellaneous.

Recently published posts




Random posts from the archive

Cancer Vixen / 15 January 2007

So did the G8 matter? / 08 July 2005

sjhoward: Not exactly Nostradamus / 05 January 2007

The art of translation / 06 January 2019

Photo-a-day 258: Ceefax / 14 September 2012

So that’s it then! / 02 April 2004




Comments and responses

Comment from Maximilian Goldenberg


    10.58, 14/05/2005

You display a total failure of understanding the true nature of Hell.


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


    11.30, 14/05/2005

The only way you could possibly know the true nature of Hell is if you are there. Otherwise you simply have an opposing belief. And if, indeed, you are in hell, then presumably this site is also there. Makes sense.


Comment from Maximilan Goldenberg


    14.29, 15/05/2005

Nobody goes to Hell unwillingly.

Maybe you should read the book

“Whatever Happened to Hell” by John Blanchard

http://www.evangelicalpress.org/books/Whatever%20happened%20to%20hell.htm

http://www.gnpcb.org/product/0891078371

Or are you too closed-minded to read such books?


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


    14.34, 15/05/2005

Maybe you should read the book

But which book? Why would I want to limit myself to the Christian interpretations of hell that you present?


Comment from Maximilan Goldenberg


    17.58, 15/05/2005

Who said anything about limiting yourself to reading just one book on the subject, which you then dismiss out of hand.

By your very response it is clear you are limiting yourself, by apparently refusing to even consider reading such a book because of its perspective.


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


    18.54, 15/05/2005

I’ve read books by authors with many different perspectives. I would not dismiss reading the above book out of hand, I simply questioed whether it was wise to point to just a single book as a source of information.


Trackback from elsewhere on the site



22:50
20th December 2005.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » The Sudoku craze rumbles on




Compose a new comment

I'm not taking comments on my blog any more, so I'm afraid the opportunity to add to this discussion has passed.


The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.