» sjhoward.co.uk

  • « Archive »
  • « Academia »
  • « Book »
  • « About Me »
  • « Twitter »
  • « RSS »
  • Ringtone Frog’s Genitals Deemed OK for British TV

    Well that’s one heck of an original headline from Reuters.

    The story is even more intriguing:

    Television adverts of the motorcycle-riding Crazy Frog, who is drawn with a broad smile and a tiny penis, run frequently on British television, amusing, baffling and annoying viewers.

    I’ve not seen that advert much, but I have caught it a couple of times and I’ve never noticed a penis. So, in an effort to discover whether or not this was a hoax, I sought out a still image. And from this, it appears that the frog really does have his bits out.

    Apparently,

    Twenty-two people complained they were worried children might see the advertising, which also promotes screen savers and mobile videos. Five parents said they were embarrassed by questions their children had asked.

    I have to say I’m surprised that so many people were moved to complain. But luckily, it would appear that there’s no problem with frogs genitalia being shown:

    “While unusual for an animated model of this type to be shown with genitalia, no sexual or inappropriate references were made about its anatomy,” the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority said.

    So there we go. And I bet there aren’t many websites out there where a frog’s bits and the Pope feature on the same page.






    Comment

    Share


    Your Comments and Responses

    Comment from the original poster, sjhoward

    Good news for the people who complained… the latest ads have the genitals censored with a big black box.

    20th May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 12:59 on 20 May 05


    Comment from NICKI

    I think that the crazy frog is a brilliant ringtone and screensavers i dont know why people are complaining about,my 6 month cousin laughs at the crazy frog ringtones please reply to me and tell me what you think about what we wrote nicki

    22nd May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 15:38 on 22 May 05


    Comment from the original poster, sjhoward

    I think you’re perfectly entitled to your opinion – but I personally find the ringtones incredibly annoying.

    22nd May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 22:09 on 22 May 05


    Elsewhere on the site

    This post has been referenced by another on this site:
    sjhoward.co.uk » Renewed, refreshed, and ready to go . . .

    [...] stuff, more like the good old days. I’m talking Eurovision, funerals, nosepicking and amphibian genitalia. Frankly, that stuff was always more popular anyway, and if that last link doesn’t guarantee [...]

    17th November 2008 | Permalink

    » This pingback was received at 13:38 on 17 November 08


    Write a new comment or response

    Commenting allows you to respond to what the author and other commenters have been said. Comments often appear on this page instantly, though sometimes take a little longer - especially if you are new to the site.

    Enter your comment in the text area below. You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Note: By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's Comment Policy.
    Gravatar: To show your face, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.





    Welcome to my blog!
    I've been writing here since May 2003, and waffle on about all sorts of stuff.
    See this page for more about me, or follow me on twitter. Enjoy browsing, commenting, and getting involved!


    Printed from http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2005/02/05/ringtone-frogs-genitals-deemed-ok-for-british-tv
    (c) sjhoward.co.uk - full conditions can be viewed at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/
    The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site.