About me
Bookshop

Get new posts by email.

About me

A brave new age of masculism?

Would this be acceptable with reversed gender roles?The issue of the incongruity of having a Minister for Women but no Minister for Men is raising it’s ugly head again, with a new campaign blog – The Rights Of Man – calling for the creation of the post.

At first-glance, it’s the kind of idea that looks like the creation of a job for the sake of balancing out the appearance of government. It looks a little bit like political correctness with no particular aim and nothing in particular to achieve. It possibly even seems a little anti-feminist.

But actually, as the blog’s priority list for a Minister for Men shows, there are quite a few predominantly male-orientated issues, just as there are for women:

  1. Make improving the educational attainment of boys a priority
  2. Make the state recognise/support male domestic violence victims
  3. Improve care and funding for prostate/testicular cancer sufferers
  4. Make judges enforce child contact orders
  5. Support equal parenting laws
  6. Provide better help and retraining for unemployed men
  7. Force a review of the CSA maintenance criteria where the mother has left her husband for another man, re-married or has simply walked out of a marriage with the children
  8. Support anonymity for men accused of rape, unless found guilty
  9. Improve care and support for men suffering from depression
  10. Campaign against anti-male propaganda and male sterotyping in the media
  11. Support equal sentencing criteria for men and women
  12. Stop the political disenfranchisement of individual men by abolishing all-women shortlists and priority lists

Whilst I don’t agree with all of those points, it does illustrate that there is real work to be done in the world of masculism. So, as a proposal, perhaps a Minister for Men is not all that silly an idea after all.

This post was filed under: Politics.

Recently published posts

‘Small Things Like These’ / 15 November 2024

Redriff / 14 November 2024

Deal porters / 13 November 2024

‘Why Fish Don’t Exist’ by Lulu Miller / 12 November 2024

For the best / 10 November 2024

Learning from crushing candy / 09 November 2024




Random posts from the archive

Cannoli / 24 February 2019

Photo-a-day 104: Milkshake / 13 April 2012

Legislation pretends to ban ageism / 01 October 2006

Paint sober / 19 September 2024

Newsweek’s ‘lasting damage’ / 04 June 2005

100% faithful / 23 January 2024




Comments and responses

Trackback from elsewhere on the site



08:56
10th May 2007.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Favourite text




Compose a new comment

I'm not taking comments on my blog any more, so I'm afraid the opportunity to add to this discussion has passed.




The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. Information about cookies and the handling of emails submitted for the 'new posts by email' service can be found in the privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links: if you buy something via a link on this site, I might get a small percentage in commission. Here's hoping.