About me
Bookshop

Get new posts by email.

About me

Photo-a-day 257: Potts drum clock

20120913-221146.jpg

This is a drum clock manufactured by Potts for the concourse at Newcastle Station, where it still hangs today. It’s about 120 years old or thereabouts. For a long time after I first moved to Newcastle, this clock had no hands. I don’t know whether it was broken and later repaired, or whether the hands were removed for restoration. But after what seemed like years of it being a broken clock, I remember being somewhat surprised to find it in full working order one day.

One of the more widely circulated pictures from the large storms that have battered Tyneside in the last few months is this shot of the very same clock, in which the roof of the station is leaking to such a degree that it looks like it’s raining inside!

This post was filed under: Photo-a-day 2012, .

Recently published posts

Moonlight / 18 December 2024

‘A long way home’ / 17 December 2024

Peanut / 16 December 2024

Jennifer Mills News / 15 December 2024

Flying Angel / 14 December 2024

Sun on a stick / 13 December 2024




Random posts from the archive

Blossom / 28 March 2019

Photo-a-day 199: MediCinema / 17 July 2012

Which plan? What’s working? / 13 May 2024

MSN Messenger 7 / 06 January 2005

Room with a view / 01 July 2024

Lies, Damn lies, and Newspaper sales / 31 January 2005




Comments and responses

Comment from Michael Potts


    23.13, 07/10/2012

Very interesting photo and comment. The only aspect of the restoration is that the design of the original hands wasn’t used when the new hands were made. All Victorian clock-makers were known principally by the design of the hands, particularly when the name of the firm making the clock wasn’t shown on the dial. From old postcards it looks as though the words “Potts & Sons” and “Leeds” were painted on the dials when the clocks were installed.


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


    16.30, 10/10/2012

That’s interesting – I wonder what happened to the original hands? I can’t imagine them just falling off, but if they were intentionally removed, it seems odd that they were lost. I wonder why they didn’t use the original design in the restoration? I suppose it could be a cost issue, but then I’d have thought that clock hands like this would have to be bespoke anyway, so where’s the advantage in making them different?




Compose a new comment

I'm not taking comments on my blog any more, so I'm afraid the opportunity to add to this discussion has passed.




The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. Information about cookies and the handling of emails submitted for the 'new posts by email' service can be found in the privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links: if you buy something via a link on this site, I might get a small percentage in commission. Here's hoping.