» sjhoward.co.uk


  • Archive
  • Videos
  • Work
  • Tools
  • Freebies
  • Subscribe
  • Shop
  • Book
  • About
  • The great advertising argument returns

    The great advertising argument returns

    Filed at 23:12 on 3rd April 2008.
    Filed by sjhoward at 23:12 on Thursday, 3rd April 2008 under Blogging, Site Updates.

    Long-time readers will know that I’ve wrestled with the question of whether to carry advertising on the site several times over the past few years. Adverts have come and gone in many different forms, from the Amazon Product Links to successful periods with Google Adsense, and from flirtations with hand-picked advertisers to the Amazon-affiliated shop.

    My last epiphany on the subject came after I wrote a negative review about one of the site’s advertisers. I’ve always maintained that advertising does not affect editorial, but I felt that it was difficult to carry adverts for a poor service. This whole incident is now referred to rather euphemistically on the site, as it lead to a legal dispute with the advertiser concerned, but essentially I took the decision to withdraw all general adverts from the site, keeping only hand-picked ads relevant to particular posts.

    Now I’m wavering on that decision. A number of high profile companies have actively sought advertising spots on the site, and at a time when it’s likely my web hosting costs are to increase, it’s difficult to refuse.

    Therefore, I’ve instituted a beta programme of advertising on the site. A dynamically chosen random third of pages will carry advertising, and I will monitor the response, so that I can do a more accurate cost-benefit analysis of the advertising model. Those who block ads will see a suitably designed alternative, rather than a big white space. Fear not: This place has never been, and will never be, covered with ads, and editorial will continue to be entirely independent of advertising – though, naturally, advertising will not necessarily be independent of the editorial.

    I’m genuinely unsure as to which way I’ll go on this, so I’d be interested to hear your opinions through any of the usual routes.



    Interact with this post

    » Leave a comment or trackback about this post

    » Read others' comments, or subscribe to this post's RSS comments feed


    Your Comments and Responses

    Mort Karman responds »

    Welcome to the free enterprise system.
    So long as you monitor the content and type I don’t see any problem. The worlds greatest media have advertisers and so long as you don’t sell out editorial content to the dollar (or in your case pound) nothing is wrong.
    Just keep it on the high level of the usual site contents and al will be fine.
    It is not wrong to make a lot of money,
    So far as I know, writers do not take a vow of poverty and chastity. (well, poverty, perhaps, chastity, NO)

    4th April 2008 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 01:22 on 04 April 08


    Write a new comment or response

    Commenting allows you to respond to what the author and other commenters have been said. Comments often appear on this page instantly, though sometimes take a little longer - especially if you are new to the site.

    Enter your comment in the text area below. You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Note: By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's Comment Policy.
    Gravatar: To show your face, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.






    Printed from http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2008/04/03/the-great-advertising-argument-returns
    (c) sjhoward.co.uk - full conditions can be viewed at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/
    The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site.