About me
Archive
About me

Blair, Wolfgang, and terror laws

close

Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 13 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 13 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and wrote about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 13 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find utterly cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

As no-one can fail to have noticed, earlier this week, 82-year-old long-term Labour supporter and Conference-goer Walter Wolfgang was physically removed from the Conference centre by ‘heavies’ after showing the single word ‘nonsense’ during Jack Straw’s speech. The police then detained him under Anti-Terror Legislation when he later tried to re-enter the hall.

This gentleman clearly posed no terrorist threat. His only ‘crime’ was to utter a single word when the Labour bigwigs didn’t want him to. And yet he was held under the ‘crucial’ Terror Laws that we were assured would only be used in the most extreme circumstances to detain the most dangerous people.

For some time, people including myself have been arguing that

Laws [cannot be] restricted to what they were meant to be used for. Judges and the police have a nasty habit of sticking to the very letter of the law … If this government continues to make laws which are this full of gaping holes, sooner or later it’s going to turn round and bite them back.

And yet, in the face of police blatantly flouting Mr Blair’s publicly stated intentions for the laws, all he’s done is apologise to Mr Wolfgang. He’s not revisiting this legislation, and he’s not even disciplining the police force. In fact, Mr Blair wants to extend the powers available to the police. And all because He, in His infinite wisdom, has bypassed thousands of years of history and declared that protection of the common-man is now more important than the freedom of the innocent. The logical conclusion of which is surely that we just lock up – or kill – everyone who we don’t like the look of.

The terrorist threat to this country may be different to that which we have faced in the past, but it’s no so great that we should sacrifice the central tenet of our justice system and beliefs. If we change something so fundamental with so little thought and debate, then what is left to protect?

This 738th post was filed under: News and Comment, Politics.

Some recently published posts

Knowledge and understanding / April 2019, 7 minutes long

‘Inappropriate’ A&E attendances / April 2019, 3 minutes long

Cruise ships and me / April 2019, 6 minutes long

Some thoughts on print newspapers / April 2019, 5 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / April 2019, 4 minutes long

Some random old posts

Tomato attack on Priminister / March 2005, 1 minute long

When was the last time anyone fought a bear? / July 2007, 1 minute long

Boris Johnson’s Website / January 2005, Less than a minute long

You lie, you die / April 2006, 1 minute long

Cost of 2012 Olympics and New Labour women / February 2007, 3 minutes long

Fathers group in Downing St stunt / February 2005, 1 minute long


Comments and responses

Comment from Joe Dzhugashvili


by Joe Dzhugashvili

Comment posted at 12:31 on 1st October 2005.

This man dared to criticize in public a member of the ruling politburo.

He should be thankful that he was not sent to a labor camp, which is what the Dear Leader should have done, instead of succumbing to petit-bourgeois sensibilities.

At the very least, his party membership should have been revoked.


Comment from Sardar Pishdare


by Sardar Pishdare

Comment posted at 09:44 on 24th October 2005.

Dear Mr Tony Blear and Mr Bush
It is 2005, the Kurd has spires that the British and American government remove one dictator and renew the power for 2 dictatorial family (Barzani and Talabani) in Iraqi Kurdistan, don’t you know this 2 family has involve of killing of 50 000 Kurd to save they power and they Stoll all the governmental good during 1991 also smuggling the Oil for Sadam Hussein.

During the cold wore, the aunty British and American has sport this 2 family to stay on the power to destroy the rod of democracy, know you sport them to destroy the Kurdish nation under the name of democracy?.

Best Regard
Sardar Pishdare
http://www.btinternet.com/~kurd.oil


Compose a new comment



Comment

You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.



The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.