About me
Bookshop

Get new posts by email.

About me

Weeknotes 2022.05

A few things I’ve been thinking about this week. The fifth post of a series, which is looking increasingly like a regular thing, inspired by Jonathan Rothwell.


At the start of this week, I spent time on a number of calls about Storm Malik and Storm Corrie which battered much of the North East. Nevertheless, I didn’t expect to see this near home:


There was a piece in The Guardian this week in which “scientists admit their covid mistakes” in an effort to demonstrate that changing one’s mind is important in science. I’m not a scientist, but my life as a doctor protecting people from serious communicable diseases has been dominated by covid for more than two years now, so this article has been playing on my mind.

Most of the “mistakes” are nothing of the sort: we all have to make decisions on the evidence and information available to us at the time, and the fact that we might make different choices in retrospect with more information available does not make the initial act a “mistake” in my book. By the same token, making a decision against the evidence and proving to be correct doesn’t equate to having miraculous foresight.

But nevertheless, we do all make mistakes, every day.

One of my mistakes was to be unduly pessimistic about the probability of a covid vaccine. I’m not well read on vaccine development, and it isn’t an area I keep up to date on: it’s a little removed from my work. And so when asked early in the pandemic about the likelihood of a vaccine being developed, I drew a conclusion based not on the evidence, but on my background knowledge. Coronaviruses circulate widely, many attempts have been made to create vaccines against them, none have been successful, therefore vaccine development in this pandemic scenario is unlikely.

I didn’t test my thinking, I didn’t consult experts, I didn’t dig into the available evidence on relatively recent breakthroughs in RNA vaccines. Had I done so, I would probably have had a different view on the likelihood of development, and how the pandemic was therefore likely to play out.


I haven’t finished a book in over a fortnight, and not because I’m reading anything especially long. This is a sure sign that I’m worn out.

This post was filed under: Weeknotes.

Recently published posts

My 2025 in 25 numbers / 01 January 2026

‘Three Days in June’ by Anne Tyler / 01 December 2025

Third time lucky / 24 November 2025

When Molly lifted Sunderland high / 10 November 2025

Deeds, not numbers / 03 November 2025

‘Air’ by John Boyne / 27 October 2025




Random posts from the archive

Cost of 2012 Olympics and New Labour women / 25 February 2007

Photo-a-day 102: Hartlepool nuclear power plant / 11 April 2012

Tail fin / 10 March 2019

We can make this marriage work / 15 February 2005

Blair’s apology / 22 June 2005

Bright ideas / 02 January 2024





The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. Information about cookies and the handling of emails submitted for the 'new posts by email' service can be found in the privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links: if you buy something via a link on this site, I might get a small percentage in commission. Here's hoping.