» sjhoward.co.uk

  • Archive
  • Videos
  • Work
  • Tools
  • Freebies
  • Subscribe
  • Shop
  • Book
  • About
  • Filed at 22:13 on 14th November 2007.
    Filed by sjhoward at 22:13 on Wednesday, 14th November 2007 under Media.

    PC WorldYou may remember Dixons, the highstreet electrical retailer that was absurdly rebranded as Currys.digital (their pointless dot and italics, not mine).

    You may also remember its wonderful press department which secured it regular free advertising via the national media, by putting out stories about items which it would no longer stock. As I detailed in a post with a remarkably prescient title, it received national coverage when it stopped selling analogue radios, 35mm cameras, video recorders, and the computer game Manhunt.

    These stories each generated acres of positive press coverage about the futuristic and ‘ahead of the curve’ style of Dixons, for virtually no cost to the company itself. Now that’s good PR - It wouldn’t make sense to sack people like that just because a brand is disappearing.

    And, indeed, it appears that the PRs’ jobs were safe - the Dixons press department appears to have shifted across to a different part of the same group of companies. Earlier this year, PC World received much coverage for its decision to stop selling floppy disks - possibly a little too ahead of the curve, given that 700,000,000 of the things are still sold each year.

    And on this morning’s commute, I note yet more press coverage, since PC World have decided to stop stocking CRT monitors. Again, possibly too ahead of the curve, given that CRTs are still preferred by many graphics professionals.

    How many times can national media outlets be conned into printing an almost identical story, which is effectively an advert for the same group of companies? Six at least, it would appear.

    If that isn’t a depressing commentary on journalism today, then I’m not sure what is.



    Interact with this post

    » Leave a comment or trackback about this post

    » Read others' comments, or subscribe to this post's RSS comments feed


    Your Comments and Responses

    Jonathan Rothwell responds »

    Someone finally got round to replacing that fuse then…

    14th November 2007 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 23:37 on 14 November 07


    The author, sjhoward responds, »

    Fuse?

    16th December 2007 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 21:52 on 16 December 07


    Nick Freestone responds »

    Well they’re at it again -

    Typical really…

    22nd January 2008 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 20:41 on 22 January 08


    Elsewhere on the site »

    This post has been referenced by another on this site:
    sjhoward.co.uk » Dixons: At it again

    [...] by chriswatkins, modified under licenceMy thanks to Nick Freestone for pointing out that Dixons are at it again, issuing the sixth iteration of virtually the same press [...]

    23rd January 2008 | Permalink

    » This pingback was received at 23:10 on 23 January 08


    Write a new comment or response

    Commenting allows you to respond to what the author and other commenters have been said. Comments often appear on this page instantly, though sometimes take a little longer - especially if you are new to the site.

    Enter your comment in the text area below. You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Note: By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's Comment Policy.
    Gravatar: To show your face, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.






    Printed from http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2007/11/14/dixons-rises-from-the-ashes
    (c) sjhoward.co.uk - full conditions can be viewed at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/
    The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site.