Facts are sacred
It was covid that drove me off Facebook, but it perhaps wasn’t until nearly five years later that it left my mind entirely.
Wendy and I were writing Christmas cards last month, and I—perhaps not fully embracing the Christmas spirit—commented that it was a risky business, as some of the families we were wishing well might have divorced in the years since we last spoke.
‘No, they definitely haven’t,’ said Wendy. ‘I’m friends with them on Facebook.’
It simply hadn’t entered my mind that there might still be a social media connection between us. Facebook is no longer in my thoughts.
And yet yesterday’s news that its founder has chosen to remove fact-checkers caught my attention. I was even more surprised to see the company had changed its ’hateful content policy’ to permit ‘allegations of mental illness … based on gender or sexual orientation’, among many other unpleasant changes.
It baffles me that this makes for an attractive proposition. If I were seeking information, I wouldn’t choose to do so on a website that is explicitly designed to make it easier to spread misinformation. If I wanted to socialise, I wouldn’t do so in a place where people are free to hurl around stigmatising accusations of psychiatric illness. And if I wanted to advertise, I wouldn’t do so on a platform where my ads would appear alongside any of this vitriolic effluent.
But… I’m pretty sure I’m in the minority, and it’s not like my objections have any meaningful impact anyway given that I don’t use it in the first place.
It was CP Scott who said that ‘comment is free, but facts are sacred’. It seems nothing is sacred at Facebook.
This post was filed under: News and Comment, Facebook.