About me
Bookshop

Get new posts by email.

About me

MTAS: Ditched. Hewitt: Still on £255,000 a year.

[flashvideo filename=”http://sjhoward.co.uk/video/pat.flv” size=”small” picture=”http://sjhoward.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/hewitt.PNG” /]

MTAS has been ditched. It will no longer be used to match junior doctors to specialist training posts. Ministers have realised that it is simply not fit for purpose.

Let me remind you what Patricia Hewitt said on Question Time on BBC One on 8th May 2007 (or remind yourself using the video mini-video on the right, or see the full-size version here):

If a minister is responsible for a major policy blunder or acts unethically then of course they should go.

Patricia Hewitt oversaw the introduction of a massively expensive computer system for matching junior doctors to specialist training posts. It has failed. It has spewed out intimate personal details of applicants onto publicly accessible parts of the web. And now it’s been ditched.

How is that not a ‘major policy blunder’?

This post was filed under: Health, News and Comment.

Recently published posts

‘Small Things Like These’ / 15 November 2024

Redriff / 14 November 2024

Deal porters / 13 November 2024

‘Why Fish Don’t Exist’ by Lulu Miller / 12 November 2024

For the best / 10 November 2024

Learning from crushing candy / 09 November 2024




Random posts from the archive

What I’ve been reading this month / 27 December 2021

The Beacon / 15 February 2024

Hasta la vista, Longhorn / 22 July 2005

Temenos / 24 July 2024

Today’s big story / 05 December 2005

I’ve been reading ‘Life as a Unicorn’ by Amrou Al-Kadhi / 16 January 2023




Comments and responses

Comment from AndrewP


    15.42, 16/05/2007

This is exactly the point I made to Patricia Hewitt in my email to her straight after the Question Time program via their website (when she said she would respond to ALL questions). Perhaps unsuprisingly I have not yet received an answer and my question has so far not been deemed ‘representative enough’ to appear on the website. Either that or she has no reasonable answer!


Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)


    07.22, 17/05/2007

I’m glad you point out she said she’d answer all the questions – I thought I must have misheard, given that they only put three on the website. Clearly, Patricia Hewitt underestimated the strength of feeling on the issue once again, and didn’t realise she’d get thousands of questions.




Compose a new comment

I'm not taking comments on my blog any more, so I'm afraid the opportunity to add to this discussion has passed.




The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. Information about cookies and the handling of emails submitted for the 'new posts by email' service can be found in the privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links: if you buy something via a link on this site, I might get a small percentage in commission. Here's hoping.