About me
About me

Traces of radiation on British Airways jets


Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 13 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 13 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and wrote about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 13 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find utterly cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider highly inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

Investigation into Litvinenko's death finds traces of radiation on British Airways jetsTwo British Airways jets have been grounded, as the investigation into Alexander Litvinenko’s death spreads yet further. 33,000 passengers over 221 flights are being contacted ‘as a precaution’.

But pilots and cabin crew wear badges that measure their dose of radiation, since they are naturally exposed to more due to being high up in the atmosphere for long periods of time. Why didn’t their badges show a greater than usual exposure, and hence detect this problem before now?

The only explanation I can think of is that the radiation is very short-range, and the cabin crew were never close enough to be affected. The radiation on Polonium-210 is very short range. Have we discovered how the murder weapon entered the country?

And guess the top destination where those planes have been been flying? Yep, Moscow. It’s looking like Mr Putin can’t ignore this investigation any longer – if the Polonium is shown to have likely come from Moscow, he’s going to have to co-operate, rather than just issue denials. But hours before this story hit the media, Mr Putin announced he’s now decided to cancel his meeting with Mr Blair.


This 1,006th post was filed under: News and Comment.

Some recently published posts

What I’ve been reading this month / February 2020, 13 minutes long

La Sagrada Família / February 2020, 21 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / January 2020, 11 minutes long

The Tyne Pedestrian and Cycle Tunnels: eight years on / January 2020, 8 minutes long

What I’ve been reading this month / January 2020, 7 minutes long

Some random old posts

Toothbrush / January 2004, 3 minutes long

Unanswered questions about the Stockwell shooting / August 2005, Less than a minute long

More rubbish from the Daily Mail / January 2007, Less than a minute long

Well I thought it was funny… / September 2003, 2 minutes long

Accidental deaths in Tudor England / December 2014, 2 minutes long

Swinging for the first time / April 2005, 1 minute long

Comments and responses

Comment from Ian

by Ian

Comment posted at 13:19 on 2nd June 2007.

Clearly, Putin is NOT, and has no intention of, playing ball with the UK government over this incident. It seems slightly concerning that someone can enter the UK, commit what appears to be a murder and then be seemingly immune from prosecution back in their home country.

I find it even more typical of modern politics that the European Union are steering clear of this debate; if Russia has signed up to a deportation treaty with EU member states (which they have), then the EU should actually take some action. The question being asked is, “is it worth making a scene over this, as it could make relations with Russia unstable?” My response would be a resounding YES -either we have a relationship with Russia or we don’t. It seems to me that Russia will decide not to co-operate whenever they want, which inhibits a proper working relationship being in existance.

In fairness to Russia though, to my understanding, the UK have blocked extradition requests from Russia, so a reasonable person could ask if there is any mileage for Russia in co-operating; relationships have to work both ways to work.

Do I think this will get resolved soon -no.

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

by sjhoward

Comment posted at 22:31 on 4th June 2007.

Welcome to the site, Ian!

What do you think of the whole situation with Russia at the moment? With the combination of Litvinenko, the US missile shield, and everything else that’s going on at the moment, are we heading for a storm in a teacup or all out war?

Comment from Ian

by Ian

Comment posted at 21:27 on 5th June 2007.


To be honest, I think that the UK and US are wiser than to escalate this issue with Russia, and I’m confident that we will avoid all out war -it seems to be a bit of a storm in the teacup. The media have a bit of a slow news week, and they think “how can we get the public interested…I know, tell them there is going to be another Cold War”. I think that the missile defence system is typical of the US who seem to think they own the planet. Although, I do think that a defence system can only be a good thing, and don’t really see why Russia has a problem with it, considering the number of missiles they own! Although, I don’t think that Russia should be allowed to point (nuclear) missiles at Europe.

But that’s probably my Conservatism coming through!

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

by sjhoward

Comment posted at 22:53 on 5th June 2007.

Hmm, I have to say, I’m not sure where this is going… it’s sort of crept up on us, and will either crawl away again or grow – but Putin and Bush are hardly the most agreeable of people at the best of times, so how are they supposed to agree with each other?

Compose a new comment


You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> .

If you would like to display a profile picture beside your comment, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.

By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's comment policy. Comments are subject to both automatic and human moderation, and may take some time to appear.

The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. This site uses cookies - click here for more information.