About me

Get new posts by email.

About me

25m peoples’ bank details lost in the post…


Hold up! Before you read on, please read this...

This post was published more than 13 years ago

I keep old posts on the site because I often enjoy reading old content on other people's sites. It can be interesting to see how views have changed over time: for example, how my strident teenage views have, to put it mildly, mellowed.

I'm not a believer in brushing the past under the carpet. I've written some offensive rubbish on here in the past: deleting it and pretending it never happened doesn't change that. I hope that stumbling across something that's 13 years old won't offend anyone anew, because I hope that people can understand that what I thought and felt and wrote about then is probably very different to what I think and feel and write about now. It's a relic of an (albeit recent) bygone era.

So, given the age of this post, please bear in mind:

  • My views may well have changed in the last 13 years. I have written some very silly things over the years, many of which I find cringeworthy today.
  • This post might use words or language in ways which I would now consider inappropriate, offensive, embarrassing, or all three.
  • Factual information might be outdated.
  • Links might be broken, and embedded material might not appear properly.

Okay. Consider yourself duly warned. Read on...

They’ve lost half the country’s bank details, can’t keep track of our cars, publish doctors’ intimate personal details online, drop customs documents in the street, misplace laptops with personal data on them, and don’t even bother with passwords on their computers.

They lost this most recent data by sending it on couriered CD-Roms, which is certainly against policy, and possibly illegal. It’s also the way they lost Standard Life and another banks’ customer details earlier this month, and UBS’s customer details in 2005.

Of course, we already know that Government can’t learn from mistakes, since they rehired the company behind the ‘not fit for purpose’ MTAS computer system.

Now they want us to trust them with our health records and even our identities.

Is this Government serious?

This 1,226th post was filed under: News and Comment, Politics, Technology.

Recently published posts

Random posts from the archive

Swing Update / 13 April 2005

What I’ve been reading this month / 27 January 2020

Thoughts on the Aftermath of Hutton / 29 January 2004

Elias Fotinis DeskPins / 27 December 2004

Photo-a-day 350: Keep calm / 15 December 2012

Photo-a-day 37: You are being watched / 06 February 2012

Comments and responses

Comment from Jonathan Rothwell

    22.38, 20/11/2007

Is it fair to blame the government, though? The problem appears to lie with HMRC, and whose stupid idea it was to send the entire database dump just through a private courier.

So, it wasn’t the government who cocked up, but HMRC.

It’s certainly not an excuse for the Tories to use in the Commons.

Comment from sjhoward (author of the post)

    16.58, 21/11/2007

Yes, it is fair to blame the government.

Error after error – including ones very similar to this – have happened repeatedly at HMRC, and whilst the organisation itself is separate from Government, it is overseen by the Treasury.

The Treasury failed to intervene in any meaningful way when the earlier errors were made – the sort of think I’d have thought that ‘overseeing’ the organisation would involve – and now they’ve been caught out.

To say that the Government can’t be criticised for this is like saying it can’t be criticised for any aspect of policy implementation, as none of this is done by Government itself.

It’s like saying that the Government can’t be blamed for the MMC Computer Problems because the software was designed by Methods Consulting, which is separate from government. Or that it can be blamed for falling conviction rates because the Police are separate from Government. Or that Tesco can’t be held responsible for sour milk because the dairies are a separate organisation.

These organisations are acting on behalf of the Government, and so the Government is ultimately responsible for their action.

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

26th November 2007.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Brown struggles to be heard

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

6th January 2008.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Useless computers cost £2bn

Trackback from elsewhere on the site

7th January 2008.

This post has been referenced by another on this site:
sjhoward.co.uk » Jeremy Clarkson: Idiot

Trackback from another website

Trackback received at 22:24 on 20th May 2008.

This post has been referenced by another website:
Barnhard Blog » Blog Archive » Data Retention

Compose a new comment

I'm not taking comments on my blog any more, so I'm afraid the opportunity to add to this discussion has passed.

The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site. Information about cookies and the handling of emails submitted for the 'new posts by email' service can be found in the privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links: if you buy something via a link on this site, I might get a small percentage in commission. Here's hoping.